A Skirmish in the Gender/Family Wars
Her name is Rachel Gilman. I’m sure she’s a pleasant lady in person.
Before we get into the nitty gritty, please take a closer look at the graphic in the lower right hand corner of the image above.
This could be the most gruesome desecration of the American flag I’ve seen. It
demonstrates the scare tactic of the coat-hanger abortion to a fare-thee-well.
300 deaths a year may be a sad statistic, but it is not a civilizational catastrophe.
Okay. That was a digression, useful only in that it suggests a likely origin for the activism of Rachel Gilman. She probably began as a Roe defender and formed a political affiliation with the LGBTQ movement, whose aggressive tactics have proven so successful at intimidating the white cis-male guilt crowd. Which takes us to an exchange I’ve just been having with an associate of Rachel Gilman, whose last names is also Gilman. The starting point is a Facebook post in which I commented on a Gateway Pundit article about a controversial candidate in an Ohio school board election.
My published excerpts from the Gateway post.
Not trying to reinvent the wheel here. Actually just the setup for a joke.
I’ve written about abortion, feminism, and women’s issues generally for more than 30 years. I’ve also written about all the LGBTQ and gender wars starting back when the only identifying initials were L and G, My positions on all of the issues have been pretty consistent over the years. I believe abortion is homicide and that it should be discussed in precisely those terms. If we decide as a society to permit unrestricted abortion, let’s be honest thot we are knowingly legalizing infanticide. I believe gay men and most lesbian women can’t help or change their sexual preference, and like many I have always accepted this difference in them while retaining an aversion to being confronted with images or portrayals of specific sexual acts they perform. I can’t help this aversion anymore than most men can help their own preference for women. (If I sound ambivalent about lesbians, it’s because I suspect a goodly percentage of their numbers consists of women who have learned to hate men, sometimes if not always for very good reasons.) I have never believed, however, that it was wise for homosexuals to insist on being loved and admired for their sexual preferences, as well as that exhibitionism is a consummation devoutly to be avoided. Not because I regard them as inferior, since they have made unique and vast contributions to high culture throughout history. Rather, I feared that over-exposure of the physical aspects of their sex lives would eventually result in a an esthetic/visceral backlash against them, which I now believe is occurring. Something nobody can help really. Not with laws, sermons, parades, flags, or entertainment propaganda.
Why I began my own post on a lighter note. In the picture Gateway published I saw the possibility of a funny video snippet. Using a little graphic cut-and-pasting and a freeby AI animation app, I closed my post with this wry observation:
All I really had in mind. Women women everywhere, nor any man to think…
Then the unlikely happened. A total stranger saw my “reel” and came in to comment. Here is our exchange.
And there the matter rests. I’m glad it happened. No minds were changed, but we were polite. And I’m cheered that a serious exchange between unlike minds could be precipitated by a joke. I’m not doing a friend request for Elijah Gilman, but comments are always welcome if they don’t try to poke the snake with a stick.
Comments