Contradicting Nostradamus

 

Predicted the last three economic meltdowns, from each of which he made a 
fortune. He’s been predicting the biggest one yet for a couple of months.

There’s reason to take him seriously. He believes the President will invoke the Insurrection before the midterm elections. His argument is at the link. I advise you to watch his initial spiel, but not all of it until you’ve read I have to say. A delay recommended only because his video uses the ‘Infomercial’ tactic of going on and on and on until you’ve invested so much time it feels like commitment. I do not agree that Trump will invoke the Insurrection Act before the midterms but after if and only if he loses his majorities in Congress. Trump is still determined to win despite the many attempts that will be made to steal votes across the nation. That’s who he is.

Here’s Rickards’s  pitch.

Here’s what I have to say, beginning from his Exhibit A on the Insurrection Act.


That doesn’t mean it won’t be opposed tooth and claw by every Dick and Jane in the soulless undead body of the Democrat Party, from the immigration traitors in Minnesota, New York, California, Michigan, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Colorado, to the activist revolutionaries in league with the CCP, the Sharia-Jihadists, the Ivy League neo-Marxists, the seditious police-destroying judiciary, and the psychotic flailings of the feminist-turned-gender/family-destroying totalitarians.

There will be violence. Riots. Assassinations and attempts at it. There will be terrorist bombs and probably bio attacks. Anything and everything to foment chaos and eliminate the President’s authority to depress Insurrection by all means available.

Why it won’t happen before the midterms. No outcome of a result achieved under the Insurrection Act could be formalized acceptably to a majority of voters. And if Trump wins the midterms, he will not need the costly side effects of the Insurrection act. He still wants to prevail the American Way, by winning “too big to rig.” The dire alternative will only become acceptable if the Dems acquire a majority strong enough to impeach Trump again, pack the Supreme Court, and undo his achievements in the realms of immigration enforcement, world trade, energy policy, the war on youth-murdering drugs, and the nationwide battle against violent crime.

But under these conditions, the Insurrection Act could be invoked with draconian measures that could jail politicians, judges, government bureaucrats, and corporate executives. Evidence against the prime culprits is already massed and waiting for the need to turn ongoing investigations into perp walks. All of these would be preferable to another assassination of a U.S. President or another coup against Trump like the 2020 election. The future of the nation would be at stake for real and forever.

You’re free to disagree with my read. I’m writing this to dissuade you from risking your financial health on Rickards’s timeline. The world is already in a state of unstable crisis. Not Trump’s doing. Freeloading comfortably on America since WW2, Europe has been committing civilizational suicide for generations now. They are not replacing their own populations. They don’t believe in anything higher than their own venal desires as much as the Islamists believe in sending their enemies to hell. This crumbling of the western world has to be stopped. What used to be the party of loyal opposition has become the party of “Death to America” accomplices.

Invocation of the Insurrection Act is more than a financial danger/opportunity for your personal portfolio. It is the last, strongest tool the President has at his disposal to fight for America against tremendous odds that have grown nothing but worse since Obama was first sworn in as President. Look for him to be arrested in one of the first weeks of the Insurrection Act. However, the primary emphasis of legal steps after that will be uncovering and prosecuting the misconduct of everyone involved in fraud during the 2026 elections. Sitting members of Congress will be too busy covering their own misdeeds to re-legislate the Constitution in the months before the 2028 Presidential election. Nothing will be business as usual in Washington, DC.

That’s right. I’m asking you to imagine what exactly might happen in what exact order. This shit really could become real if we lose the midterms to the likes of Mamdani, el Sayed, AOC, and female insectuals like Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson, Maddow, Whitmer, Spanberger, Sherrill, and the Somali harpies.

We are in grave danger, perhaps the worst in our history. We elected a Trump-type President too late for national salvation to be secured without significant pain. Sorry to break it to you if you missed it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Readers also liked…

Saving the Democrats a lot of time

Image
  Conflicted identity and media image woes By now we know if you’re a Democrat, getting elected isn’t about who you are, what you’ve done or haven’t done. It’s about how people see you. The factors that can do in a candidate are often more subtle than the pundits of the professional wrestling circuit called the mainstream media. Why we think it’s time to help the world’s most uninformed voters about who to elect as their next nominee for President. We’re not going to get all racist and sexist about it. The decision points we’ve discovered are all based on the individuals involved, not the immaterial fluff like experience or political philosophies. We’ll start right at the top and give you one simple thing to bear in mind before you try to pick a winner for 2028. Kamala Harris Not about the word salads or the escort thing. Too Desperate. Gavin Newsom Too Lyle Waggoner. Times change. Bernie Sanders Too ‘Little Big Man’ AOC Too prematurely passé  Gretchen Whitmer Too Lily-White J...
Read more

The AI Challenge

Image
Did the District Attorney of Philadelphia propose blowing up Trump’s White House Ballroom and auctioning off pieces of the rubble to cut the deficit? The Answer Provided by Google’s AI Assistant:   Yes . Our topic today is Larry Krasner and his record as the District Attorney of Philadelphia and apparent higher political aspirations. Our purpose, though, is not purely political. It is to provide a demonstration of how Artificial Intelligence applications can be used in personal research that goes deeper than the media ever do. It is also to show the pitfalls of relying on such applications without a dogged determination to be thorough. The programmers behind the computer “intelligence” are always there, and they are just as human and political as, well, the elitist geeks who write the code. There are always two big questions to answer before undertaking what will be a long and complicated post on a complicated topic. First, Can I do it? And second, Do I really want to do it? This t...
Read more

Why did it have to be snakes?

Image
  AI is independently objective? Not politically biased?  Not a powerful hidden censor? Guess again. This post isn’t about AI. But AI is now part of an increasingly ominous context in which the fate of western civilization is being played as both low comedy and high tragedy. I use an AI app as a satirical tool. It enables you to make still photos of faces say things from a long list of snappy quotes and music clips. A lot of the quotes are themselves satirical, with voices altered from the original speaker or singer, to make them funny in some other mouth. But they don’t like it when you use their little app to make certain sacred cows look stupid or dishonest. Any Every time the name Trump appears in a headline over a photo featuring one of his thousands of enemies, the Revive app is certain to flag your work in process as NSFW, as in not safe for work in the politically correct Progressive media environment. You’re not allowed. If you try to appease by moderating headlines o...
Read more

The Real Sword of Damocles Hanging Over Western Civilization

Image
This is what I call an omnibus post. That is, it will contain many links to what I have published here and elsewhere previously. Not going to apologize for that. I don’t mind asking you to read a variety of approaches to the same gigantic topic. It’s a topic so big we’ve all become accustomed (or trained ourselves) to deal with it only in pieces. But the pieces are all part of a larger whole that has grave consequences for the culture as a whole. A great many people aren’t going to like what I have to say here, but it’s time it was said. I won’t be mincing words. If you feel like contending with specific points I am making, you’re well advised to read what’s at the links before you cut yourself the easy break of dismissing this post as irrational or wrongheaded or over-generalized. It isn’t. It just won’t be popular. A word about the word ‘general’ as it used in vernacular expressions like ”in general” or “generally speaking.” We all do generalize, mostly without acknowledging that whe...
Read more

Bad Max as a challenging lesson

Image
  Mad Max as you’re supposed to want her Having finished my Mad Max post yesterday, I realized I had confined my discussion of the ‘Instant Gratification’ problem to the MAGA fainthearts. Their inability to look far enough forward to envision consequences is far less than that of the whole half country full of  Democrat apologists and Trump haters. Shouldn’t I address that fact in some comparable terms to what I just wrote? I guess so. The easy answer is referencing the two recent Mad Max sequels provided to us by Woke Hollywood. But I haven’t seen them. I had no interest in paying to see them in a theater. At one point I did put one of them, Furiosa I think, on my IMDB watch list. I received a notification that it would be briefly available on one of the streaming services and I did tune in to watch. Lost interest about 15 minutes in, by which time the old rules had it a good movie should have you hooked. I was not hooked. It was just the same cinematic backdrop as the Road W...
Read more

The Rest of the Story About the Clancy Trial…?

Image
    I won’t kid you. I’m exactly where Nancy Mace is on this case. Even Cluck and Buck were better at providing an appropriate legal context for the farce just played out in Massachusetts. Drug and alcohol intoxication are not legal defenses in murder trials. Combat veterans suffering from documented hallucinogenic episodes of PTSD have also been convicted of murder and given harsh punishments. The PTSD diagnosis does not suffice for an insanity defense. It is sometimes admitted after the verdict as a possible mitigating factor in sentencing. In legal terms sanity is knowing the difference between right and wrong. Lindsey Clancy has no basis for claiming that she forgot it is wrong to murder three helpless children in your care.  The cultural debate has been focused on the supposed uniqueness of female “feelings.” Which men cannot understand. Which is a crock. I understand the why’s wherefore’s of people wanting a Get Out of Jail Free card just for being a “woman.” (To sa...
Read more

Concerning the 250th Anniversary of Our Nation

Image
Happy Independence Day No. 250!  I’m planning to do my part for the year-long celebration of the still remarkable birth of the United States of America. Just starting to realize that the number of us who remember the last big anniversary in 1976 is getting smaller every day. Why I have some special ideas about focusing on the moment of transition, that is the tick of the clock last night when the 249th year became the 250th. A kind of time capsule that may be buried now but dug up later to see who were way back when you were still as young as you think you are now. My credentials for the job. Quite a few actually, but the most important one today is that I was a working participant in the official Bicentennial celebrations back when I was still young. I wrote a post about it almost 10 years ago, ancient history in today’s 24/7 chronometer dial.  In honor of the ones no longer with us from that time, I dug up the old post from the Wayback Machine and put it back together here a...
Read more

An Unscheduled Interrupt on AI

Image
  RAV’s Frank Gaffney discussing existential crisis of AI  with statecraft guru Sam Faddish. What could go wrong? This, for one thing: He has his own gaggle of Chicken Little AI experts. And, inevitably, this: Me, when I’m not hiding my true self behind a photograph They’re all worried about AI. Terrified in fact. For different reasons. Bannon has some apocalyptic seer who’s worried about meta-humans replacing Homo sapiens. Gaffney and Faddis are fixated on the latest AI hot topic, “The Singularity,” that magic moment when a supercomputer becomes self aware and decides to exterminate mankind. How did we get here? The usual way. The movies. First, there was HAL: Then, just a quarter century later, after a decades-long detour through a dead-end time paradox called The Terminator , there came the monstrous harpy HAL, a transgendered terminator in a box, like we’d been brought up to believe in, including Gaffney and Faddis: Worried yet? Here’s her resumé and mission statement. C...
Read more