Who’s been all over SCOTUS this whole time?

 

Here they all are, smiling in more felicitous days.

What they really are in the context of CHYOS.

In the wake of the anonymous leak of the Roe decision 

and the attempted assassination of Bret Kavanaugh.

So of course they pronounced themselves unable to identify 

which SCOTUS clerk was responsible for the leak.

Mostly they did not much. No cases accepted regarding election fraud,

 multiple lawfare outrages against Trump, or suits seeking stoppage of 

 The massive unlegislated federal lawlessness at the border.

When necessary, they interceded directly for Biden 

and the DOJ, as when they stayed an order for the 

feds to stop censoring social networks. Cool.

Otherwise they were conspicuously quiet in their giant mausoleum of Justice.

Until the border became a constitutional flashpoint…

…when the court finally had to stand up and be counted…

In case you wanted to know who voted to kept Texas from stemming the tidal wave of illegal immigrants, federal vaccine mandates, the drugs and human traffickers, and the “refugee” terrorists who were getting slowed down by Lone Star razor wire… here they are: It was the five women on the court (pic above shows Chief Justicette Roberts flanked by the other girls who don’t care about 300 fentanyl deaths a day or child and woman sex slavery rings as long as their DC-suburban homes are safe from protesters.) There is no possible Constitutional figleaf for this decision.

Here’s the funny part. All the pissing on their own principles still won’t save them. No matter how much the new majority of five does to smooth the way for their DOJ keepers until November. When Trump has been safely imprisoned, defeated, or assassinated, the UniParty President — be it Gropin’ Joe or, hopefully, Michelle O — will still stack the court with a new slate of victim judges and run the old ones out of town by every available means.

SCOTUS 2025