Being the continuation of InstaPunk and InstaPunk Rules
Seismic Cracks in the Icy Coalition of Democrats
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Is that a bullet hole? Or a black hole?
It’s complicated. We don’t like complicated. If you can’t say it in a tweet or a 30 second sound bite on teevee, don’t waste our time. I remember some decades ago when it was a great joke one year that USA Today had just won a Pulitzer Prize for “Best Investigative Paragraph.’ These days any argument that requires research, in-depth analysis, and careful piecing together of the people and partisan positions involved is easily dismissible as conspiracy theory, most likely by right wing fascist liars.
Why don’t we like complicated? That’s simple enough. We don’t like complicated because we can’t do it anymore. By the time we get to school we’re already too dumb to acquire the kind of critical thinking skills needed to navigate ‘complicated,’ and the philosophy of education now in place has adapted by ceasing any attempt to teach critical thinking skills or provide the base of historical information and learning that used to make investigative reporting possible and even occasionally credible. How did we get so dumb? That’s the result of something called a feedback loop, which I just described earlier in this paragraph. Through multiple generations, dumb parents raise kids to be dumber than they were at that age, then not teaching critical thinking leads to parents who are even dumber next time around, and, well… wash, rinse, repeat. In this case the wash part is a washing away of what used to be called intelligence. A word we might also once have defined as a tolerance and even appreciation for the complicated things in life.
Elsewhere I have already dispensed with the fallacy that there is anything like a constant ‘average IQ’ through time. In fact, the entire IQ testing establishment has been gamed to conceal the sad truth that IQs are declining, and have been for a long time. We really are dumber than we used to be. Worse, IQ tests don’t measure intelligence at all. They just measure what they measure and less of that all the time.
So, why am I bothering to write about the probably fatal seismic shattering of the nearly century-old Democrat Party coalition which has already done so much to eviscerate all our institutions and minds? Another simple answer. Because I have faith. Faith that writing it down is worthwhile even if there’s no one to read it or understand it. And because I can.
Bridging the chasm of empty acceptance always begins with a single step.
You see, once you reject the idea that something, anything, is too complicated to understand you will start to perceive that the universe is sending out helpful clues about what’s going on. This is actually a feature of the universe, which is its own set of nested Chinese Dolls. If we can follow the doll sequence down far enough, there will eventually be a doll small enough to be studied in detail and thereby provide information about all the others as well.
We have just been given a doll of the perfect size. That is the role of the Claudine Gay story. She is a one-woman confluence of all the colliding parts of the Democrat shattering that is underway. What are the colliding parts? All the key components of the coalition: the Z Generation, the edifice of American education, women, blacks, Jews, LGBTQ’ers, muslim immigrants, and the overarching ideology of victimhood. Not to mention a native New Yorker, which is hardly a trivial credential. As a representative to one degree or another of all of these Dem constituencies, Claudine Gay was supposed to be clad in impenetrable armor, the kind that would make her an unstoppable weapon against all of the Democrat’s targeted enemies. That’s why and how she came to be Chosen by the most prestigious university in the land to be their President some several months ago.
But it has all blown up, almost like a Saturn rocket on liftoff. Why? Because the coalition is not really an alliance of the like-minded, not really a coalition but more like a cartel, which is defined as a truce between competitors who can agree on a handful of shared selfish objectives. Cartels always break apart when self interest finally forces differences into the open and what could once be blinked away becomes, finally, a deal killer. OPEC prospered as long as the member nations profited by gouging the United States on the price of oil. It crumbled when member states began to discover advantages, better deals, by dealing with customers under the table. Why shouldn’t they go for a better deal? It’s not like they were ever really all that fond of one another. There were always potentially disastrous differences hiding under OPEC’s magnificent conference room tabletop.
The same is true of the Democrat coalition, going all the way back to its establishment by FDR. He realized that if you combine the voting blocs of people who didn’t have enough in the depths of a Great Depression with the voting blocs of those who would benefit more directly by growing the size and reach of government, you could win every national election in perpetuity. The great Harvard preppie with the cigarette holder therefore became a hero to the masses by appealing to their fears with promises and giveaways. Trade unionists, poor people of all races and ethnicities (including recent immigrants), women with children and out-of-work husbands who couldn’t be certain of avoiding starvation, and all the people who already worked for government or wanted to.
After his first four years as President, FDR had barely made a dent in the depression, but he was spending money like mad and whenever any program failed, he always had a new one, a new, even bigger promise to offer. It’s all he needed. He got elected President four times, and what brought America out of the Great Depression was not the New Deal but World War II. His coalition survived his own death from dementia in 1944, a year into his fourth term, and his successor knew a good thing when he saw it, making the New Deal growth in government permanent by blessing all the formerly temporary employees as unfireable members of the civil service in good standing.
With few interruptions, the Democrat Party controlled both houses of Congress by significant majorities for the period from 1933 until the Newt Gingrich ‘Contract with America’ finally turned the House of Representatives back to the Republicans for a few years.
It’s a great strategy for winning elections. It has its own built-in feedback loop., especially after the masterful tweak added by LBJ in which he succeeded in pulling the black vote completely away from the Party of Lincoln by promising a Great New Society That actually succeeded in destroying black urban neighborhoods and replacing them with permanent crippling dependency on the monetary largesse of government. All of which government failed to correct any of the problems it was supposed to, because the real genius of big government is that it’s its own welfare program, employment for political allies in such numbers that their various agencies can never be efficient at anything they do but lobbying for a bigger budget next year. Best of all worlds. Government grows because it can’t be stopped from growing. People in need never rise out of need except through well publicized government interventions like Affirmative Action, and even the middle classes become more dependent on government as more of their lives or regulated and restricted by government.
Most brilliant unintended consequence? The party that pioneered so much money given ostentatiously away becomes the automatic home base for every emerging group that sees itself as the victim of an unfeeling capitalist system. Even the rebels who rise specifically in opposition to government policy are subsumed by that same government. Radical draft dodger opponents of the Vietnam War return home from Canada or the commune to regain reputability by becoming academics, bringing their left wing views with them. Along the way, they discover the same keys to power the party has known about since FDR. Control the narrative and you control the outcome. Keep the stupid people stupid and make them even stupider in every possible way but doing what the smarter people in charge tell them to.
Through variations of this story, the Democrat Coalition has continued to grow and evolve. They eventually took over all the greatest institutions of higher learning in the land. By that means they also gradually acquired control of all the professions, even the clergy. The conquest of hard science was achieved similarly. The perversion of the social sciences was always inevitable, given its lack of any quantitative basis whatsoever. This triumphantly empty branch of academia was therefore perfect for the pioneering of an entirely new kind of academic writing, in which the total absence of new idea content is covered by impenetrable neologisms in vocabulary and an incestuous reliance on the process of establishing credibility by mass-producing and mass-citing of the exact same fact-free hearsay.
I’ll explain later. For now consider it a tease.
Enter Claudine Gay. And enter the arrow of Paris, poised to shatter the coalition like the piece of glass it is.
Gay first. She is a shining symbol of the New Democrat Coalition that has systematically replaced the FDR Coalition. In many ways a perfect and invulnerable champion of the progressive left because she embodies so many of its constituencies in a single persona. Female/feminist, gay, black, CHYOS (Harvard and Stanford), LGBTQ+ and DEI activist, and President of the most powerful academic institution in the world. A veritable Achilles of the left, as portended in Ancient Greek mythology. Yes, Ulysses effectively drafted the peerless demigod warrior to fight in the Trojan War, which unfortunately did not end happily for Achilles despite some good innings early on.
On with the show. The composition of the New Coalition that’s been steadily replacing FDR’s is, our favorite word here, complicated. Time for some photographic exhibits to demonstrate the scope of what’s involved.
HARVARD POWER
This is where the New Deal Coalition began. The influence and intellectual force of Harvard’s historical cultural horsepower cannot be underestimated. This little rotogravure could go on for pages, and it’s a big part of the armor Claudine Gay donned when she was named President.
Political Archetypes
FDR, JFK, Leonard Bernstein, Norman Mailer, Alan Dershowitz, and Barack Obama are just the
tip of a very large liberal iceberg that has steamrolled politics, arts and literature, and the law.
Political Soldiers
Bill Gates, Mike Wallace, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Cornel West, Michael Bloomberg,
Bill Kristol, Natalie Portman, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Chris Wallace, Mark Zuckerberg.
NEW YORK POWER
Why is this credential so high up on the ladder of power attributes? The Harvard-New York connection is so potent that it threatens to undercut the Crimson’s claim of being the educational lord of the universe. About half of the representative Harvard people shown above have New York roots of one kind or another. It’s not a coincidence that both places consider themselves the capital of the world, albeit in slightly different but overlapping realms. There’s an ocean of confidence fueling both. It’s also no coincidence that both places are intimately involved in the sustained effort to bring down Donald Trump.
No shortage of power in the New York lineup, which includes the Majority Leader of the U.S. Senate and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, as well as key players in the J6 Committee’s televised trial of the former President and in the efforts to jail and bankrupt him in the New York court system. Harvard’s choice of Claudine Gay fits smoothly into the Empire State progressive narrative of Social Justice on behalf of ‘Democracy’ and ‘Equity.’
From Left to Right: Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senator
Kirsten Gillibrand, Governor Kathy Hochul, Attorney-General Letitia James, District Attorney
Alvin Bragg, Mayor Eric Adams, Reps. Dan Goldman and Jerry Nadler, the Revs Al Sharpton
and Louis Farrakhan, and Civil Court Judge Arthur Engoron.
BLACK POWER
Political Headliners
The 118th Congress includes 62 black members, 11.5 percent of the 535 total. This percentage is just under the 12.4 percent of U.S. population made up of black people. Not quite there but close. And considerable progress since the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s that finally ended the Jim Crow rule of southern Dixiecrats and made it possible for African-Americans to run for office throughout the nation. Since the presidency of Lyndon Johnson, black people have ironically quit the Party of Lincoln (and MLK) for the Democrat Party. The Congresspeople shown below are representative of the emergent diversity of the Black Caucus, which now includes more women and more Muslims than ever before.
There has been similar progress in the Presidential Cabinet, where black officeholders actually constitute more than 12.4 percent of the total, with 6 of 26, with black executives accounting for 23 percent of appointments confirmed by the Senate.
And for the first time in U.S. history, there are now two black members of the Supreme Court, of whom the female is an outspoken Progressive.
Collectively, these results highlight the overdue nature of Harvard’s selection of its first ever black President. Easy to infer that there has been a firm Progressive hand behind such an advancement.
From Left to Right: Senator Cori Ford, Rep. Elijah Cummings, Rep. Bennie Thompson, Rep. Jamaal Bowman, Rep. Maxine Waters, Rep. Ayanna Pressley, SecDef Lloyd Austin, EPA Admin. Michael S.
Regan, Rep. Ilhan Omar, and Associate Justice Katanji Brown Jackson.
Cultural Breakthroughs
It would be difficult to overstate the contribution to contemporary black power provided by the Black Lives Matter movement, which has even succeeded in attracting Harvard’s attention. The $2 billion impact BLM has had on urban businesses and neighborhoods, well worth the hundred or so lives lost in the process. We wouldn’t be where we are as a nation now, and Claudine Gay wouldn’t have made it to the head office of University Hall without them.
Washington, DC. Enough said.
Likewise, a sea change has also been underway in the nation’s media. The newly dominant streaming services have discovered the enormous financial benefits to be achieved by separating out and specifically featuring entertainment programming that is exclusively by, for, and about black people. Rosa Parks would be so proud of black people having the opportunity to be all by themselves for a change. Even the Obama’s are in on it with their Higher Ground production company. The boldness of such initiatives is amazing. Just imagine. Not even the white supremacists would have the nerve to start a streaming service called Allwht, would they? The laugh’s on them now.
From Left to Right: Black Entertainment Television, Higher Ground Productions, Netflix “Black
Leads” offering, the Urban Movie Channel (precursor to) the Allblk Channel, and the new and
blacker Black Entertainment Channel Plus.
FEMALE POWER
As we’ve been seeing, the original FDR coalition has changed over the course of the 20th and now 21st Centuries. These new infusions of power represent additions to the carapace protecting Claudine Gay as Harvard’s President. Most importantly to a huge percentage of the American population, of course, is her status as the only the second female president (succeeding the first ever) in the university’s 387 year history. We have grown used to women in power, though it has remained stubbornly elusive in key respects until very recently. Gay’s ascendancy addressed one of those heretofore elusive respects.
Political Power at the Highest Levels
You know the powerhouses, including the ones who shake the earth behind the scenes as well as in
official elected positions. We’ve had a Speaker of the House and a Vice President. Also Hill and Jill.
There are 26 federal office positions considered cabinet-level. Since Kamala Harris is included
on the list in her capacity as VP, this means half (lucky 13!) are occupied by females. The good
news is that - depending on how you count - only eight of the rest are white males. Also, of the
secretaries above, only three have experienced headlines that could be construed as scandalous.
Four of these appointments occurred within the last two years, during
the Biden administration. That’s progress and power by any standard.
These are all very major changes, easily lost in the hustle and bustle of more seemingly spectacular news, for example what we’re beholding in another of Claudine Gay’s principal causes…
LGBTQ+ POWER
Something exciting happening in this realm almost every day now. Who would have thought that Harvard would choose an openly gay President of the University? Well, they could see the writing on the wall. All the walls everywhere, even the ones in the bathroom…
Congress
Cabinet Officials
Trans, Sec’y Pete Buttigieg and Deputy and Ass’t Sec’y HHS Rachel Levine
Open Secrets
Mum’s the word on these, but we all know why the elite political world is loosening up at last.
News/Talk Media
Ellen DeGeneres, Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, and RuPaul. Role models all.
Entertainment Celebrities
Top Row: Gay, Bi, and Trans stars in some order
Bottom Row: Trans, Established (Ellen/Eliot) & Up-and-Comers
LGTPQ+Ped Pioneers
Epstein and Weinstein. Politics & Hollywood getting their heads together.
Stuffed shirts are finally learning to be playful, even childlike.
It’s a time of great normalizing of relationships that used to be so stilted and distant. Leadership matters.
MUSLIM POWER
This is a subject not spoken of enough. One might have thought, until her congressional testimony, that Claudine Gay was not truly supportive of advancing Muslim power in the United States. Why all the categories of conviction covered above are so necessary to understand. President Gay’s ties to the Muslim Community are implicit in her identity as a New Yorker and a black woman. It’s complicated.
What matters for the moment is that Muslim Power exists, is important, and is growing steadily. Why Gay was so brave not to cave to the superficial clamoring for the Israel-above-all position of her congressional cross-examiners. Such a pandering would amount to several kinds of betrayal. For example, who else among her natural allies and constituents would not be so appeasement-oriented when it comes to the question of a Palestinian Rights? Perhaps these exhibits will help you understand…
How So Many People in This Country Really Feel
So-Called “Mostly Peaceful Protest” at the White House, Jan 13, 2024. Click the pic.
Reality. Claudine Gay is used to it. Even the Ivy League is getting used to it. They don’t like it much, but there are wheels within wheels on this subject. It’s complicated.
JEWISH POWER
The Jews are not like any of the other groups being championed by the Progressive Movement. Why? The discrimination they’ve experienced is markedly different from that of all the others, who have been for decades, even centuries, locked out of every opportunity for equity in this nation. The Ivy League (and, yes, Harvard) is a perfect example of the difference. So is the Congress of the United States.
Unlike black people, Jewish people are not underrepresented in Congress relative to their percent of population. They account for 2.4 percent of the U.S. population, but they make up 6.9 percent of Congress, nearly three times higher than demographic equity.
They are also significantly overrepresented at Harvard and elsewhere in the nation’s most prestigious colleges and universities, who have employed discriminatory admission policies to keep them from crowding too many others out. If you revisit the Harvard Archetypes and Political Soldiers shown above, they are about 50 percent Jewish.
What does this mean? It’s the real cause of the deeply ingrained antisemitism that afflicts most of the rest of the world. Jewish immigrants to this country arrived as penniless and hungry as any other. Like the others — Polish, Italian, Irish, Chinese, you name it — they were not accepted anywhere. But they’ve had thousands of years of practice arriving in foreign lands this way, and they did what they always do. Work at anything and everything, endure every humiliation, and put every bit of time and money saved into the education of the children. Who climb out of poverty within a single generation and start making waves — and oodles of money — everywhere. Which guarantees they will be hated in perpetuity. Harvard can’tnot let them in, because 1) Harvard wants to be the best (used to anyway), and 2) Harvard does not want to be like the Progressive asshole at Princeton who banned them completely from the university to avoid dealing with them. So Harvard and all the others not presided over by Woodrow Wilson accepted a lot of Jews and just tried to keep the numbers within acceptable limits, which made their degrees worth more than others and created generations of intellectual and cultural rebels who were brilliant at spotting prejudice wherever it was and going to war against it in every way possible. They regarded themselves as oppressed even if everyone else thought they were overrepresented in all the money-making professions and businesses, and so they became — TA DA — Democrats, in almost the same percentages as post-LBJ black people.
The profound irony in all this is that Jews wound up inventing much of 20th Century Liberalism and almost all of modern day Progressivism, forgetting somewhere along the way that there’s more to justice than winning the argument.
Where they are now. But all of the ones who ostentatiously hate them, including most of Claudine Gay’s constituents, have done some big-time forgetting of their own over the years. Like who was always in the vanguard on Civil Rights, Feminism, and progressive political revolutionary theory and practice.
Civil Rights Movement
Click on the pic.
No, maybe they didn’t start it, but they were among the first white martyrs to the cause. Two of the three murdered Civil Rights workers in 1964 Mississippi were Jewish. What say you to that Farrakhan, Sharpton, and Jeremiah Wright?
Feminist Movement
Gloria Steinem, Bella Abzug, Susan Brownmiller, Andrea Dworkin. The Big Mamas
all women should remember, including this eccentric sister from Down Under…
Collectively they wrote the gospel (and the political playbook) of feminism, rape law, pro-choice activism, and innumerable other reforms of marriage, employment, and economic opportunity.
Historical Democrat Liberalism
Jacob Javits, Abraham Ribicoff, Howard Metzenbaum, Carl Levin, Arlen Specter, Joe Lieberman,
Paul Wellstone, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, and Ruth Bader-Ginsberg. Liberal Democrats all.
They fought for liberal causes like freedom of speech (even for Nazis), organized labor, civil rights, graduated tax rates, and government assistance for the poor and underprivileged, and held the course even as the world began sliding into the Vietnam era morass of Weathermen, Black Panthers, and an insurrectionist drug-fueled counterculture…
Which their own descendants were also ringleaders of…
Modern Progressive Action Strategies
Mark Rudd, Jerry Rubin, Abbie Hoffman, William Kunstler: SDS, Chicago 7, and their lawyer.
They may look like hippie freaks, but they came from schools like Columbia, Berkeley, and Brandeis. The stuff they did was no accident. Every member of Antifa owes a debt to all these guys.
Saul Alinsky, the Godfather of modern-day weaponized ‘progressive’ politics
He wrote the manual that gave Hillary and Obama step by step instructions for destroying their political enemies. In the words of Wikipedia, “Responding to the impatience of aNew Leftgeneration of activists in the 1960s, Alinsky – in his widely citedRules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer(1971) – defended the arts both of confrontation and of compromise involved incommunity organizingas keys to the struggle forsocial justice.
“Beginning in the 1990s, Alinsky's reputation was revived by commentators on the political Right as a source of tactical inspiration for the Republican Tea Party Movement and, subsequently, by virtue of indirect associations with both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, as the alleged source of a radical Democratic political agenda. While criticised on the political Left for an aversion to broad ideological goals, Alinsky has also been identified as an inspiration for the Occupy movement and campaigns for climate action.”
American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.
Wiki summarizes their work thus: “It is the strategy of forcing political change leading to societal collapse through orchestrated crises. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, amassing massive unpayable national debt, and other methods such as unfettered immigration thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse by overwhelming the system.”
Sound familiar? Their ripple effect continues…
Trump Hunters
You should know who these ruthless haters are by now. And, yes, they’re all Jewish.
They learned the lessons of Frances Fox Piven and Saul Alinsky all too well. They are a big part of the reason why Biden is President and the demons of the Middle East are out of the bottle. They should have known better, but when you’ve trained yourself to be a political butcher and you both enjoy it and profit from it, it’s hard to know what to do when some of the knives you’ve been handing out are poised at your own throat. Why we’re seeing some…
Divided Loyalties
Sadly, the souls of most of these shrewd and skillful people are already lost. Everything they do actually adds to the power and fury of the antisemitism that is gathering momentum like a boulder rolling downhill. Their own directionless will keep exacerbating the cracks in the glued together but otherwise irrational coalition of which Claudine Gay is a paper-thin symbol. Her personal ruin has been accomplished. The complete ruin of anything like a comprehensible Democrat agenda is in process, crazing the ice they’re skating on with hundreds, even thousands, of…
MORE CRACKS
The Plagiarism Virus
Here’s the really funny part about the Plagiarism Thing. It’s actually a perfect fit with the rest of the emptiness of Claudine Gay’s symbolic identity. It fits in two different ways. First, her degrees are in social science, which is an oxymoron to begin with. There’s no hard science at all in what is called racial studies, gender studies, or other flavors of sociopolitical cant masquerading as academic disciplines. The only math involved has to do with counting survey results, which are, like all the academic papers, merely statements of opinion, citing the opinions of others in a kind of hearsay circle jerk. Once a basic opinion set has been established, there’s really nothing new to say, which is why plagiarism is built into the process. Steal the idea, steal the opinion, where’s the hard line between that and actually stealing the words too? Nobody’s going to read any of this. It’s all endlessly repeating a half-baked notion (why I put in the graphic of the Hollow Earth book above). What all social scientists are depending on. Gay wouldn’t have gotten caught if she hadn’t given someone a reason outside her so-called research to go looking.
What’s even more fascinating is the specific cause of Gay’s, and the Democrat Party’s, quandary. A really inconvenient, no-win showdown between Judaism and Islam. Especially hard for politicians who are devout atheists and nihilists to begin with. Here’s the funny part. It’s really easy to decide between Judaism and Islam. The second one is nothing but a half-assed plagiarism of the first by a power-mad pedophile megalomaniac. But nobody has ever read the Quran against the Old Testament of the Bible, anymore than they’ve ever read a single PhD dissertation in the social sciences.
Perfect. Really. Where does that leave us? We could make the next steps into a movie, I suppose. Except somebody already did that and there’s no need to plagiarize the original. Here it is, complete with cracking sheets of ice, white Klan-like robes, and lots of butchery in an endless wasteland…
THE BATTLE ON THE ICE
Imagine who you want in the uniforms, but this is only of many battles on the ice that will unfold as elements of the left tear each other apart at everyone’s cost. Harvard cannot replace Claudine Gay without offending someone in the coalition. If they don’t choose a black LGBT female committed to DEI they will be seen as pandering to right wing critics. If they do choose a clone of Gay, they will be seen as pandering rather sickeningly to the extreme left. If they choose a Jew, the Muslims will get violent. If they choose a Muslim, the Jews will savage Harvard and the Democrat Party financially. If they choose any other woman, they will simply be proving once and for all that Affirmative Action is the university’s only mission. If they choose a man rather than a woman, they will be seen as cowed sexist sellouts to the patriarchy. (Who knows? They might try an end run with a race/gender-irrelevant Satanist… but that would not end well either.) They have no good choices now. Very much like the Democrat Party. Why battle will be joined in destructive perpetuity in what used to be the crystalline intellectual sphere of the left. There will be lots of casualties, both institutional and personal. Because even the most complacent average Americans out there will ultimately come to see that the only ones with no champions on the left are people like them. And the New Coalition will come apart in chunks. And the first and most symbolic victim will have been Claudine, the wannabe female Achilles with a heel of clay.
And afterwards…
The Crackling Breakup of the Old FDR Coalition
A place to start over someday…
CLAUDINE GAY IN RETROSPECT
Or, in her own words, in a brand new assignment and mission…
Okay. Not really her words. Might as well be though. Claudine is no one’s child but her mother’s. Pretty fragile Joan of Arc figure for a war fought on crackled ice. She’s Batwoman, a costume wearing a confused biological female. An ill-conceived rip-off of a tired icon. Because she presumed for no good reason to symbolize everything, she wound up as the definition of nothing but a sad story for everyone. Canceled after a brief run. Mazel tov.
This post was last updated at 11:25 AM, Tuesday, July 8. Latest entries are “Responding to a Post by Michael Smith,” “Sometimes They Drag Me Back in,” and “An AI video Hoax to be wary of.” The Instapunk Times is hot off the presses... NEW: Undernet Black was updated recently. This will be a pinned post in perpetuity, but it will be updated continuously, just like all of our lives. The title — “My World and Welcome to It” — is stolen happily from James Thurber, who is known as a humorist, unabashedly untrained cartoonist, and dog lover. He was also subject to melancholy, a drinker of note, and something of an outsider (in his own damaged eyes at least) as an Ohioan, born and educated, who became a fixture in the glamorous Algonquin Roundtable of Manhattan writers and playwrights. I can relate to all of that but the fame and the lifelong journey to blindness. I believe he was likely the best writer of the gang that gathered in the Algonquin Hotel in the 193...
Il Douche as the lefties like to call him On the first day of Summer, 2025, it’s time to take stock on what is and is not going on in these United States of America. The desperate remnant of what used to be the official Democrat Party is still trying to depict Donald Trump as an anti-Democratic authoritarian fully engaged in the process of destroying our Constitutional protections against a single executive ruling by decree and the tactics of terror. We’re five months in now to the second term of this president, and it’s appropriate to demonstrate what could have happened in that time and did not. The pic up top is of Mussolini only because there’s a superficial physical resemblance between Il Duce and The Donald . The more accurate comparison for our purposes is with the favorite avatar of the left, Adolf Hitler and His Nazi Party. People with Internet access, even Democrats, can confirm to themselves that Hitler came to power on January 30, 1933 by means of an electoral ...
There’s a serious article in the works on the current state of AI technology, but this post is mostly a fun way of showing how a sheaf of new apps are playing with its capabilities. It’s probably closer to Whwt most people imagine AI to be than the experts who are alternately promoting and fearing its life-changing potential. Not a bad way to prepare the soil for the planting of some new ideas later on. Saw the article posted above and was immediately reminded of a cartoon app I had used on the Fovernor of California about a year ago. I was happy enough with the result because it did resemble the Governor, but that didn’t stop me from using his name to open the post and make sure readers would recognize him on the steps of the Capitol. I made a number of cartoons for future reference, some of which I subsequently used when a given subject’s behavior was cartoonish enough. Why I have something like 65,000 image files It’s called exploring the technology. I do it all the time. I use what...
What’s all the fuss about? Israel is only twice the size of LA. Not worth even half the attention, right? This may look complicated, and in the mechanics and timelines and geopolitics of it all it is, but underneath all the noise it really is simple this time. Iran is committed to the destruction, the utter annihilation, of Israel. They will never change their policy about this. Iran wants a bomb. No amount of wheedling, negotiating, or compromise will end this obsessive hunger. Israel wants to take care of them alone. Why? Apart from Trump in the White House, there is no one they can trust. The opposition party and even a big chunk of the Republican Party are willing to sell out Israel with intelligence leaks, stall tactics, and and everything conceivable to make Middle East conflict profitable for their purses and careers. Netanyahu, battling appeasing insurrectionists of his own, has decided this is his best and perhaps only opportunity to cut off the head of the snake. None o...
Click the graphic to go right to The Glossary I know there are those out there in the Facebook Universe who do come to look at the longer thought pieces I generally reserve for IPR and other of my websites. The traffic here, by the way, is not chiefly driven by Facebook, which accounts for only 17 percent of the IPR audience. This post, though, is primarily for you FB friends who may want to see one of the taproots of views I regularly express about the UniParty, the decline of the rule of law, the nexus of media and left-leaning government institutions, the assault on Judeo-Christian principles, the abortion debate, and the ongoing war between and among victim classes in the United States of 2023. Now that may sound like a dose of medicine, but it isn’t. The Glossary at Shuteye Nation was a satirical work of a little more than 10,000 words, presented dictionary-style, words and terms in alphabetical order with their definitions. It was written in the year 2000. With the possible excep...
Magnetized Obsidian? Back when early attempts to destroy the Trump bid for the Presidency had already failed, media pundit Don Surber coined a new term to describe what he was starting to notice. He called it Trumpenfreude , an odd phenomenon in which the most rabid Trump haters fell victim to various misfortunes in their own careers. He thought it might be a coming trend. For many months he checked in with new instances of such mishaps. Some Hollywood star who dissed Trump in public had a big movie flop. A congressman who repeatedly ranted about Trump lies got caught up in a hometown scandal involving fraud and, um, lots of lies. A sexy singer who sneered at Trump’s conduct with women had a sex scandal of her own. The various Trumpenfreude outcomes were too dissimilar to one another to be the work of some set of Nixonian White House ‘plumbers.’ They just kind of happened. People screwed up. People failed at some ambitious attention-getting stunt. They got sick. They got humiliate...
A key video that won’t load after a brief title flash in the time capsules below Yes, the President is standing on a knife edge that stretched all the way from California to Iran and beyond. I’m keeping an eye on it, as I’m sure many of you are too. But unlike the pundits and other seers of the mass media, we the people who live in the real world know that there’s not much we can do to affect what will happen in the hours and weeks ahead. We’ve already done what we had to do, which is elect the best available candidate for the job of making the tough decisions about how best to proceed in our interests. Beyond that, our responsibility is primarily to remain calm and do the work we’re best suited to doing. In my case that means writing stuff I think it worthwhile to write about as honestly as possible. That accounts for most of my time, but being as old and uniquely situated as I am, there’s also a continual overhead I have to pay in the form of what I call Reclamation ; that is, ...
By my watch it’s the third day. How to explain what Trump has been up to in the Mideast? He’s been doing what he always does. Working for the deal he wants after all the rhetoric and bluster and the moves and countermoves are done. What did he want? The safety of Israel, which is our only agent of Democracy in the Middle East. An end to the killing as soon and for as long as possible. And most of all, he wanted Americans to be as safe as possible from the deliberate and collateral damage inflicted by crazy people in the greater Islamic world. What were the obstacles he had to overcome? 1) Irrational, incredibly violent emotions on both sides, by Israel and by Iran and the organizational instruments it has used for 45 years to attack, terrorize, and otherwise intimidate Israel and its few real allies in the western world. 2) A seriously degraded U.S. intelligence capability, lacking both the political will and the human on-the-ground resources to discover What the Hell was really g...
He’s gone. This never happened. Don’t tell me I’m the only who’s noticed. That would mean I’m having a psychotic break, into a state called dissociation. But I’m pretty sure that’s not the case. What I’m referring to is bigger than a solitary breakdown because it takes in too much to be one man’s delusion, no matter how vast his imagination. What I’m talking about is an increasing sense of unreality in the everyday experience of an entire population. No, not just a sense, an atmosphere that involves all the senses. Nothing looks, sounds, smells, feels, tastes quite right, and even time is out of joint. There are still connections, some glue that binds pieces together but the connections are twisting, torquing, breaking and reattaching in new ways. There is movement through time, but even the ticks of the clock are changing speed and pitch, mocking us all individually and collectively, so the only thing we can be sure of is that reality itself is becoming the globs in a Sixties la...
The Facebook version of me read a post this morning by a smart man named Michael Smith. He was talking about third parties. I read his ‘Essay Part 1’ and was disposed to make a comment, which got thrown out for being too long. So here it is. Smith’s post is first. Robert Laird’s response is second. MICHAEL SMITH. Essay 1: The Case Against a Third Party My granddaddy, Baker T. Goodwin, when faced with something with which he disagreed, used to say, “I’m agin’ it,” and when it comes to this “America Party” nonsense floating around - like Ross Perot’s old Reform Party - I’m mostly still “agin’ it.” But I’ll toss in one caveat: if we’re talking a third party, it better be a complete replacement party for the GOP and whatever scraps of the Democrat Party still respect the Constitution - if any exist – but if there are any left, they’re hidden better than a moonshine still in the Ozarks. Conservatives need to learn to play the long game, or we’re doomed to a future of Demo...
Comments