Being the continuation of InstaPunk and InstaPunk Rules
Welcome to ‘Reels’ Fans
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
A snip of what’s up at Reels.
I wouldn’t normally use this site to promote a single joke at Facebook’s Reels investment in ACHD social network communications. This is a special case in a couple ways. The graphic basis comes from a post at Breitbart by John Nolte, whom we admire for his courage and his encyclopedic knowledge of (yeah, I’ll use the highfalutin’ word…) Cinema. It’s long been a conviction of mine that the most indispensable credential for opinionating is knowing at least one subject extremely well. Nolte’s love and expertise about all things connected to Hollywood and its extraordinary cultural contribution for over a hundred and fifty years now qualifies as just such a credential. He was with Breitbart from the beginning and has survived all the ups and downs there because he never stops doing what he does best, which is write about all the phenomena that have affected and changed the world since this breakthrough project was produced in 1872:
Edward Muybridge. Ever heard of him? Someone else who knew,
understood, One Thing extremely well. And changed history.
Nolte has an intuitive understanding of the fact that performing in front of cameras has become the secret obsession of a lot of people who don’t know much of anything extremely well, although dollars comes in a close second with most behind personal sexual gratification. Two things about which the Hollywood Legacy has understood very extremely well. Nolte has been monitoring the impact of these obsessions on Hollywood, just as he always has, and more recently on all the institutions and disciplines led by wannabes auditioning for the role of Esther Blodgett in A Star is Born. He knows the difference between talented creative people and greedy scene stealers who mostly ruin what they tinker with. It pains him that the movies are dying, that entertainment television is dying, and that those who are responsible for reporting on these and other matters critical to the mental health of the nation are laughable puppets in a 21st Century Punch and Judy Show.
Got the idea. Had to do it in one minute or less because Blogger pretends that a
video longer than one minute exceeds its 100MB limit on vid file size. Poppycock.
All the news we get from Alphabet networks is just performance art. Murrow and Cronkite may have entered the television studio in part because of their newspaper experience, but they both had long experience in packaging their output for broadcast media and selling the results with their vocal delivery skills. Everything after them has been show business, men with gravelly voices slowly giving way to good bone structure, teeth, and on-air attitude. Women? Same as it ever was. Faces and figures and flirtatious manners. Who led successive generations of men in the same direction, except for the neckline and legs categories.
Now Scott Pelley acts like a cheerleader who had to give back the prom queen crown. Why I loved the John Nolte piece that startedlike this at Breitbart.
I’ll get back to why I showed you this. Right after this…
Here’s the full text of what Nolte gave us:
FTA: <<If Scott Pelley weren’t real, those of us committed to destroying the corporate media by exposing how awful these people are would have to invent him.
In short: what a gift this pompous ass is.
Never stop talking, Scott Pelley. Please, never stop.
After 37 years at CBS News and some 20 of those years at 60 Minutes, change was coming, and this self-absorbed, entitled leftist just couldn’t deal with it. Bari Weiss took over at the helm of CBS News, her new hire was about to take over running 60 Minutes, and Pelley decided to go out using an electronic version of suicide-by-cop. In an all-hands staff meeting, he raged against Weiss, he attacked his new boss as unqualified, and got what he wanted — fired. Now he can play martyr. Now he can sue. All very transparent.
But he’s also a gift to those of us who want to remind every Normal Person in America that you can never hate the legacy media enough.
What’s the first thing Thurston Howell Pelley III does after his firing? He released a photo of himself at the wheel of a fancy sailboat. Oh, yeah, he’s in touch with Real America. This must be a video of Pelley heading home after his sailboat photo op:
But the real gift was yet to come, and that was with his weekend New York Times interview. Naturally, he’s only lobbed softballs — few things are as useless as leftists interviewing leftists — but his cold arrogance, his sniffing elitism, his breathtaking sense of entitlement… Everyone needs to read this to understand that the legacy media are irredeemable. This guy never should’ve been allowed in the front door, much less celebrated today. And the fact that a so-called journalist who makes everything about himself in the most childish and unprofessional way is being celebrated tells you just how broken this institution is.
Here are a few excerpts…
Pelley claims there’s no evidence 60 Minutes is biased, or even that people perceive it as biased.
Bari Weiss “didn’t offer any kind of a metric” to back up her claim that people see the show as biased, he sniffs, adding: “Do you have a poll? Is there market research? What are you talking about? We felt that she was making statements that she couldn’t back up and was coming into the news division with hardened preconceived notions that didn’t seem to be thought through.”
He then admits he chose to ignore a request from Weiss, and when I say “ignore,” he just went ahead and broadcast the story without even acknowledging her request or bothering to ask why she saw it that way….
Weiss directed Pelley to describe ICE protester Renee Good’s car “as driving toward the officer” just prior to the ICE officer shooting her dead in self-defense.
“This is not what you see on the video,” Pelley falsely explains to the Times. “On the video, you see the officer standing slightly off the front of the car. And you clearly see Ms. Good’s wheels turned completely as far as they will go, away from the officer.”
“So,” Pelley brags, “I decided that I wouldn’t do those things. I wasn’t going to get in a debate about it. I wasn’t going to call Bari Weiss about it. I was just going to refuse to make those changes.”
You’ll note that according to Pelley himself, Weiss did not ask that he report a claim Good “aimed” her car at the ICE officer, but only and factually that she was “driving toward the officer” – which is indisputable.
Let me tell you right now, if I ever published a piece here at Breitbart without making the changes requested by my boss, I’d catch hell. If I refused to even acknowledge the request and arrogantly published as though I were the final word and owned the joint, I’d probably be fired, and rightly so.
Then there’s this beauty from Pelley…
“I’ve never worn the uniform. But I’ve been in combat for this country, in Afghanistan and Iraq, Kuwait. I’ve been shot at, spent nights in foxholes filling up with water in the desert. I’m not aware that the president of the United States has ever done any of those things for his country. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
“I’ve been in combat for this country.”
Man alive.
And let’s not forget that President Trump gave up a dream life and was shot for his country.
Pelley closes with this…
CBS management doesn’t “know what they’re doing,” he says. “And there’s a subtle political bias that I’ve never seen at 60 Minutes before, or at CBS News before. So that is my hope: a return to sanity. We can save this. It’s possible to land this plane. But right now, CBS News is on fire.”
He’s the classic narcissist who’s written himself in as the indispensable hero of his own story, who’s certain 60 Minutes will not survive without him.
If you wanted to expose the corporate media in the worst way imaginable, you couldn’t invent a better fiction. Let’s hope Pelley never stops talking, although I fear Pelley will go the way of Chuck Todd, Terry Moran, and Jim Acosta — disappear into the Substack as their former employers somehow stumble along without them.>>
I inserted the pic Nolte linked. The only one that appeared on the Breitbart page was this, shown in the screencaps above.
A pop-up captioned as an advertisement
This is the whole reason I made the feel I posted at Facebook. To my eye the similarities between Pelley’s Mussolini pose and Robin Williams’s undercover Resistance garb, (the cap, the cap, thinking of Alistair McLean’s Navarone movies…) were about more than bone structure. In fact, I can prove it:
THE GUNS OF NAVARONE original 1961 posed b/w lobby still photo
James Darren as the Greek Resistance fighter Spyros Pappadimos.
Kind of perfect for how Pelley views himself in the twisted post-Watergate “Save the World” fantasy that elite journalism has taken on in jettisoning reporting for sabotage of political undesirables. The Mussolini pose comes as a result of being outed and having to assert his native authority in place of the official authority he’s just been deprived of. Inside, though, he has still has the image of himself working behind enemy lines against great odds to bring down the MagaReich he was battling long before Trump came down that escalator. Pelley sees himself as a genuine hero of the oppressed masses he’s never met. No doubt that’s the explanation for his inapt references to combat experience. He’s not referring to Iraq and Afghanistan. He’s referring to 60 Minutes, where he fights the good fight by spinning the propaganda that hurts or slows down the evil enemy.
Why I had to put the two pics officially together, and then why I felt obligated to explain why I’d done it.
Which is my final nearly seditious point in writing this. (And even in putting myself through the totally unnecessary slog of building a one-minute video that took more than 60 graphic files and half a dozen graphics apps to make. I wanted me to remember I had made this point about pop-up-land…)
Pop-up-land? It has no flag, no membership card, no union. It’s just there, an incidental weapon in the asymmetric war being fought across the Internet. All these websites who are also trying to save us from the Great Satan, however constituted, have set aside their own pristine journalistic ethics in the quest for advertising dollars. I know it keeps the doors open in hostile economic territory. But with those dollars comes pop-up creep, the seemingly random insertion of distracting photo/video ads in between paragraphs of earnest reportage. Gateway Pundit, whose fundamental values I don’t criticize, nevertheless is also now a full-fledged accomplice in the legal cannabis trade and quack remedies for everything from impotence to tinnitus to baldness to Alzheimers Disease. Breitbart too. Plus a lot of reasonably priced Chinese crotchless lingerie every household needs. (Um, where’s the button that lets my 13 yo son read Breitbart and Gateway without seeing a seductive stream of nearly naked women in the process?)
I notice it at the old sage pundit sites too, on RAV and News Nation, etc. Old guys who are definitely trying to help Trump save the nation by working at under-compensated jobs they’ve taken after getting thrown out of Fox/Murdox or wherever. “But first, ten minutes on my inexpensive pamphlets on how to make a fortune from gold in a collapsing economy, and then in our last segment, an interview with the physician who’s responsible for the new wonder drug that will make you 30 again by joining my Health Prescription Club for Old White People @betooyoung.com…”)
They’re all at us, all the time, from all sides. No telling who specifically is behind a lot of it. The one I’ve called out today strikes me as illustrative of how subtly it can be done but this is an instance I believe to be genuine individual ‘resistance’ activity inside Breitbart. Somebody’s private joke, hoping someone else would notice.
I noticed. That’s kind of what I do. Notice things.
Let me conclude with something unexpected that may be as half true as it is half false from the much maligned Bruce Springsteen.
The only Springsteen title my wife ever mentions. That’s something. Far be it
from me to point out he’s probably undermining the Common Man persona
he’s performing onstage these days. How the knuckles crack, you know?
This is what I call an omnibus post. That is, it will contain many links to what I have published here and elsewhere previously. Not going to apologize for that. I don’t mind asking you to read a variety of approaches to the same gigantic topic. It’s a topic so big we’ve all become accustomed (or trained ourselves) to deal with it only in pieces. But the pieces are all part of a larger whole that has grave consequences for the culture as a whole. A great many people aren’t going to like what I have to say here, but it’s time it was said. I won’t be mincing words. If you feel like contending with specific points I am making, you’re well advised to read what’s at the links before you cut yourself the easy break of dismissing this post as irrational or wrongheaded or over-generalized. It isn’t. It just won’t be popular. A word about the word ‘general’ as it used in vernacular expressions like ”in general” or “generally speaking.” We all do generalize, mostly without acknowledging that whe...
Invocation of Nemesis by the Summoners Click on Rosie. Thought I’d get this part out of the way right up front. I’m reminded of Oscar Wilde’s famous quip about the upper class British sport of fox hunting: “The unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible.” As it happens, I’m working on two different posts at the same time this morning. This one and another one about the sad PR plight afflicting the unfortunate middle child of the three worst First Ladies in American history. . What the posts have in common is that the dominating element of both stories is a function of female psychology and can only be understood in those terms. There’s also the irony that Wilde’s jibe can be applied with some justice to both predator and prey in the two posts. Because I’m going to admit at the outset what most of the MAGA faithful won’t. You are right that Donald Trump is responsible for much of the imminent danger we are facing as a nation. Without his arrival on the political scene 11 years ...
Conflicted identity and media image woes By now we know if you’re a Democrat, getting elected isn’t about who you are, what you’ve done or haven’t done. It’s about how people see you. The factors that can do in a candidate are often more subtle than the pundits of the professional wrestling circuit called the mainstream media. Why we think it’s time to help the world’s most uninformed voters about who to elect as their next nominee for President. We’re not going to get all racist and sexist about it. The decision points we’ve discovered are all based on the individuals involved, not the immaterial fluff like experience or political philosophies. We’ll start right at the top and give you one simple thing to bear in mind before you try to pick a winner for 2028. Kamala Harris Not about the word salads or the escort thing. Too Desperate. Gavin Newsom Too Lyle Waggoner. Times change. Bernie Sanders Too ‘Little Big Man’ AOC Too prematurely passé Gretchen Whitmer Too Lily-White J...
Did the District Attorney of Philadelphia propose blowing up Trump’s White House Ballroom and auctioning off pieces of the rubble to cut the deficit? The Answer Provided by Google’s AI Assistant: Yes . Our topic today is Larry Krasner and his record as the District Attorney of Philadelphia and apparent higher political aspirations. Our purpose, though, is not purely political. It is to provide a demonstration of how Artificial Intelligence applications can be used in personal research that goes deeper than the media ever do. It is also to show the pitfalls of relying on such applications without a dogged determination to be thorough. The programmers behind the computer “intelligence” are always there, and they are just as human and political as, well, the elitist geeks who write the code. There are always two big questions to answer before undertaking what will be a long and complicated post on a complicated topic. First, Can I do it? And second, Do I really want to do it? This t...
Yeah. Click on the blue headlines. There are two precursor posts to this, both still in-process. I’ll finish and link them later. One is about the death of the historical novel, which mirrors a lot of other deaths in our culture. The other is about divorce, an absolutely transformative and deadly factor in what has become of us as a nation. What does that leave us with? The end result of our progressive devolution, largely invisible to all, because it is a function of the variable we tend to think of as a constant, human consciousness. Which it isn’t. I’ve written quite a lot about the consciousness problem over the years, and Instapunk Returns, as well as a couple other of my blogs, contain 5+++ years worth of thoughts on the topic. I’ll be sending you to those posts here, providing you with an excerpt, usually the lede, a sample graphic or two, and a link. The order is roughly chronological. I’m not going to give you any particular setup from piece to piece. The relevance to the main...
Happy Independence Day No. 250! I’m planning to do my part for the year-long celebration of the still remarkable birth of the United States of America. Just starting to realize that the number of us who remember the last big anniversary in 1976 is getting smaller every day. Why I have some special ideas about focusing on the moment of transition, that is the tick of the clock last night when the 249th year became the 250th. A kind of time capsule that may be buried now but dug up later to see who were way back when you were still as young as you think you are now. My credentials for the job. Quite a few actually, but the most important one today is that I was a working participant in the official Bicentennial celebrations back when I was still young. I wrote a post about it almost 10 years ago, ancient history in today’s 24/7 chronometer dial. In honor of the ones no longer with us from that time, I dug up the old post from the Wayback Machine and put it back together here a...
Mad Max as you’re supposed to want her Having finished my Mad Max post yesterday, I realized I had confined my discussion of the ‘Instant Gratification’ problem to the MAGA fainthearts. Their inability to look far enough forward to envision consequences is far less than that of the whole half country full of Democrat apologists and Trump haters. Shouldn’t I address that fact in some comparable terms to what I just wrote? I guess so. The easy answer is referencing the two recent Mad Max sequels provided to us by Woke Hollywood. But I haven’t seen them. I had no interest in paying to see them in a theater. At one point I did put one of them, Furiosa I think, on my IMDB watch list. I received a notification that it would be briefly available on one of the streaming services and I did tune in to watch. Lost interest about 15 minutes in, by which time the old rules had it a good movie should have you hooked. I was not hooked. It was just the same cinematic backdrop as the Road W...
It’s kind of a big deal when the NYT slips a story through the paywall. Why this one? I was going to leave this story alone or tag it with a quip at Facebook when I first read about it at Gateway Pundit. They’ve already dumped it from their morgue of recent posts, but there were two more stories this morning that changed my mind. One at Breitbart about an on-air TDS one-liner at Fox Sports and another about the hairdresser’s lawsuit in the sports newsletter leaked through the paywall of the New York Times. The Times piece is excerpted above. The Breitbart post is a mere throwaway item, located far down the Main Page of the website with no names mentioned. Here’s a quick clip of the show Breitbart was referencing: I think both publications sense that something significant is going on here, but they just don’t quite know what it is. That’s when the title of this post occurred to me. “Tempest in a Foxhole.” Mixed metaphor obviously. Tempest in a teapot is a standard dismissal....
I accidentally discovered an apt new term to describe what’s going on right now. I was having fun with a recent Breitbart post referencing one of CNN’s duller voices. Atheocracy. Kind of perfect. Nailed home by the sudden leftist welcome of support from the Satanists in opposing the Texas Abortion law. Not to mention Cher’s redefinition of democracy as anything which enables a woman to get her way in every way she desires. A simple definition of Atheocracry. Every belief system involving the divine is non-scientific, worthless, and necessarily to be crushed out of existence. So we can all always do whatever we want, no matter who gets hurt. What happened? Dr. Doolittle’s Pushmi-Pullyu. Often Characterized as a sexual stalemate. Men and women have battled for control of society forever. Both sexes (there are exactly two) have competed for power for over thousands of generations. Thurber’s War Between Men and Women. Jeez. That’s been a while ago. Feminists believe ...
Comments