Being the continuation of InstaPunk and InstaPunk Rules
How us Multimedia Guys Play
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Riminem
Where do fun ideas come from? Juxtapositions that no one’s put together before. Oranges and apples type stuff. In my last year of academic French studies, I took an AP course from an exceptional teacher who focused a good part of the year on writers not included on the recommended AP reading list. Early in the fall, he slapped a copy of Camus’s “L’Étranger” on his desk, told it was on the list, but informed us he wouldn’t waste time on such trash in our class work. We could read it if we wanted, just not in his class.
Instead we devoted well over a month to the study of the four great French Symbolist poets who were seminal to the development of, among other things, modern poetry and modern art. Their names were Baudelaire, Verlaine, Rimbaud, and Mallarmé. The first two were very accessible and quickly enjoyed by everyone. I memorized and still remember some verses of both of them. The other two were more difficult, considered so in their own country, so not surprisingly more abstruse for American teenagers in high school. I struggled with them until our teacher, Mr. Miller, shared a connection with one of my own favorite writers. Mallarmé (and the other symbolists, we were assured) drew considerable inspiration from the poetry of Edgar Allan Poe, whose complete poetical works were translated into French by the master himself, Stephane Mallarmé. After reading his translations out loud to myself, I could hear Poe in his own poems as well, and it was even easier to see the influence in Baudelaire (“The Flowers of Evil”):and Verlaine (“Les Chansons Long de Violons”).
Rimbaud was a farther reach. He was the real wild man of the bunch. Living the high life, he stormed Paris as a teenager, finished writing poetry at the age of 19, became a gun runner, and died younger even than Poe did, at the age of 37. Poe was the fearless adventurer in literature, creating new genres as he drank his way to the profundities of life and death, and Rimbaud was also an adventurer, both in letters and in the reckless acting out of his fantasies. I learned to appreciate his poetic works but neglected them after my school years until I happened upon a movie called “Total Eclipse.”
1995. David Thewliss and Leonardo di Caprio.
Well, okay then. Mr. Miller had neglected to tell us about the precise relationship between Verlaine and Rimbaud. It was not a happy story. The IMDb ‘Metacritic’ from ReelViews said of it, “Despite its flaws, Total Eclipse is the kind of movie that stirs thoughts and ruminations about the nature of genius, the true meaning of art, and the unfailing capacity of great people to destroy themselves and others.” It was a French/Brit production and so probably more frankly portrayed than it would have been here at the time. I didn’t feel shocked by the movie as much as cheated. The poetry was what interested me the most and the sexual angle eclipsed it pretty thoroughly (pun intended). It also made me realize that I had never seen photographs of Verlaine or Rimbaud, or at least not that I could remember. Did they really look like Thewliss and di Caprio? I found pictures on the Internet. Yes, they did, kind of. Close enough anyway.
There I left the Rimbaud story again for nearly a decade, until I came across an intriguing coincidence. My taste in music has always been eclectic — ranging from classical to AC/DC, with Jazz, Blues, Motown, Country, and even Zydeko in between — but Rap had always thrown me for a loop. A few individual hits got through to me, but I overlooked the stars of a genre that often seemed more focused on murdering rivals than producing a body of work. Then I stumbled on Eminem in the movie “8 Mile”:
2002. Starring himself. Final ‘8 Mile’ Rap battles here.
After that I paid occasional attention to Eminem, whose private life and album releases got lots of press, and I realized he was getting better, developing rap into something that could be accessible even to outsiders like me. When I looked around for comparisons to help me explain why I found him interesting, the image of Rimbaud popped into my head. By image I mean the photographs I had found some years back. That was my ticket to a post at the old Instapunk that seemed to piss a few people off, even one of my close friends. [click on these to blow them up and stretched even more…]
Take a breath, then…
When I got criticized via actual phone calls from friends who were afraid to comment in print, I did an Update…
I let it go at the time. Not much more I could do at the time without writing a book no one would read. Who cares what I think about two delinquent white boys I have some obscure connections to. (Yes, Eminem too, in my own Detroit years, I learned about the Mile Roads that circle the city and drove through them, raced to appointments through them, many times…)
Then, as I continued to play with graphics and caricatures and such, I found an application called ‘Mixing Booth’ that enabled me to blend two faces into one. They work for politics and the contemporary gender confusions we call equity. Here are a few I worked out in the Mixing Booth:
That’s the process by which I arrived at the photo of ‘Riminem above. Uncanny likeness of both, I think. Now what if… what if… unnhhh, what if I could mix together a Riminem Raprecording? That might be fun. A lot of work but a lot of fun and maybe it will suggest other things that might be done with a similar approach…
I provided the backbeat. Many fine artists supplied the images. Happens with Poe too.
All things considered, it didn’t take that long to do. If you’d like to see what a translation looks like in part, here’s an excerpt:
Rimbaud: ‘The Drunken Boat’ translated by Estill Pollock
…alone, I reach the rapids, guided through beyond a sense of distance—double-crossed to screaming savages, my crew nailed naked to the bull’s-eye totems, lost.
No second thoughts for deck hands: the cargo scow of Flanders grain, of English cotton, cast clear of the imbroglio upstream to catch the careless current down.
The winter runs to tantrum tides, empty childish fury fuelling my direction, the breakaway peninsulae, each tinny coup, slaves for my selection.
I wake to tempests. The oceans sanction my weightless two-step on the flood, the waves beneath, breaking towards extinction, the harbour lighthouse blind to salty graves.
This seepage hull, this apple flesh, this crab- green infancy of sweetness shoals the seams, snap-anchor swells that clear the scab of vomit, wine, this listing bridge of dreams.
And now awash in milky starlight, sea rhymes sunk to these devouring azures, nudged by the drowned, pale subsidy of pain the brooding look of corpses cures;
where, though a sudden cobalt saturates, measures languid time, beating to the noon, a manic, boozy chord dictates a bully red, love’s dregs, its bitter tune…
The translator also provides some additional information about the poem and its author. As a bonus, here’s a Mallarmé translation into French of Poe’s Annabel Lee.
Anyway, I had fun. Which is the whole point of playing.
How this post came to be. Saw this promo from the wrecked icon called the New Yorker and was reminded of a post put up here some months ago: Why didn’t I crop out the squatting woman? Truth in advertising. That’s not true, actually. In fact, it’s a lie. I wouldn’t have stumbled on this lovely screenshot if it weren’t for an image I’d used in a Facebook post some days before: You won’t believe this, but while Iwas posting the pic just above, my wife showed me her ROFL pic from the The Babylon Bee… …Which is obviously directly relevant to the rantings of the Glasser person who thinks everything Trump has ever done or will do is a mortal sin against the Manhattan scripture called The New Yorker. Don’t get me wrong. I used to love The New Yorker. Then they surrendered it to the Smart Women, under the subscription-shrinking stewardship of Tina Brown, whose legacy has led gradually to the dollar-a-copy pitch shown in the first graphic above. Today’s mag looks a like the old one, but tha...
I’ve been at sixes and sevens about this post since I knew I had to do it. Even had a hard time picking the leadoff graphic. This one does convey the idea of questioning the decision by a great man of senior years. But this one introduces the notion that Philip Glass’s principled stand is one that has been sponsored by indolent dilettantes who didn’t give a fig about the Kennedy Center during the decades in which it has been literally falling down. Falling down. Along with all the forms of high art the Kennedy’s were trying to inspire with a facility for culturally significant performances by the nation’s most gifted artists. Interesting and ironic that they choose the 87 years Philip Glass to deliver their most stinging blow against the unspeakable privately financed renovation of the crumbling building and its wayward preoccupation with niche artistes. Am I getting ahead of myself here? Did you miss the story when it broke? Lawrence O’Donnell, the left’s fantasy Dean of Jeffersonian ...
HINT: It’s more than flashy hair. President John F. Kennedy now resides in a curious limbo. He was briefly the face of the Democrat Party as it wanted to see itself in the post-WWII era. In hindsight he was an anomaly in the party’s history. Before JFK, the most prominent Democrat Presidential contenders teetered between the crude (Andrew Jackson, William Jennings Bryan, Harry Truman, Al Smith) and the unashamedly elite (Stephen Douglas, Jefferson Davis, Rutherford B. Hayes, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Adlai Stevenson). JFK was an interesting hybrid of both. Like Al Smith, he was a Roman Catholic, like FDR a graduate of Harvard College. His lineage also had its disreputable side, with a family fortune reputedly acquired by bootlegging during the Great Depression. Backed by that fortune, he became famous and successful at an early age but was criticized as callow and rumored to be a philanderer in his first years in the Senate. When he became a presidential candidate, he was a clear brea...
Lewis Hamilton wins Seventh World Championship at Formula 1 Grand Prix in Turkey: A stunning drive from Mercedes’ Lewis Hamilton in the Turkish Grand Prix gave him his 10th victory of the season – and, more crucially, saw him claim the seventh drivers’ title of his career, to equal the record of Michael Schumacher, as Racing Point’s Sergio Perez and Ferrari’s Sebastian Vettel completed the podium after a thrilling race in Istanbul. Hamilton had started the race in sixth, risen to third midway through the first lap and then dropped back to sixth by the end of Lap 1 after an error at Turn 9. But a decision to change his intermediate tyres just once saw Hamilton drive a masterful race to claim victory by over 25 seconds from Perez. The win alone was enough to claim championship #7, but it was even more assured after a disastrous race for Valtteri Bottas - the only man who could have stopped Hamilton winning the title today - who spun six times en route to a P14 finish.
Haven’t been here for a while. Cooling my heels on maybe half a dozen posts for which I have content materials assembled and the writing just awaiting the typing I don’t feel like doing against the relentless pass rush of AutoCorrect/AI. Stranded, I guess. My principal emotion is akin to what I felt back in 2019, when I took a year off from this site because who can write about dread every day? Like then, my mind is telling me the Dark Age is upon us because we don’t deserve to be saved from the fate our enemies intend for us. They’re brain-damaged sociopaths; a near majority of us are just brain-damaged. Good guys and bad guys both done in by appalling lack of education and undeveloped consciousness skills at foreseeing consequences from a Universe-of-One perspective. I don’t like gas prices at the pump, I don’t like the way Trump talks so mean, and the Iran thing I just don’t get, so I won’t vote this time. Fine. We get what we deserve as a nation. That’s the real American Way. No ot...
R. F. Laird of Yardarm University “University of California-Berkeley professor and former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich proposed the radical idea for a post-election commission to censor speech and name and shame every public figure who supported President Donald Trump’s rise to power. He wrote on Twitter over the weekend that “when this nightmare” — or Trump’s presidency — “is over, we need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It would erase Trump’s lies, comfort those who have been harmed by his hatefulness, and name every official, politician, executive, and media mogul whose greed and cowardice enabled this catastrophe.” In response to the tweet, several Twitter followers agreed and even raised the stakes of his proposal. “I am thinking more of using the postwar Nuremberg Trials as a template,” one Twitter user wrote, speculating that criminal trials should be in order. “Felonies were committed as were treasonous behaviors. The guilty should be arrested, tried, convicted and f...
The Mark Hamill thing. A matter of puzzlement to many people. I have an idea about what’s going on with him, which I’ll explain because I’m thinking most people are just chalking it up to projected career disappointments. Which is part of it but not all of it. I know that the language issues surrounding the topics I’ll be touching on are prohibitive, since words no longer mean what they used to, but I’m just laying it out here and everyone is free to take it or leave it as they choose. There’s an easy answer and a deeper answer. The easy answer is just scratching the surface but should show the value of common sense in a long-distance analysis like this. Easy? For Hamill, Trump is a stand-in for Harrison Ford. Looked them up. Ford is 6’1”. Hamill’s bio claims 5’9” or 5’10” though the claim is challenged by those who say he’s more like 5’7” give or take. It’s not political, the Trump hatred. Not really. The TDS mania that pervades Hollywood was an attractive nuisance just waiting f...
We, of course, were as offended as anyone by the President’s evident pleasure in being depicted as Creator of the Universe. His later insistence that it was just a plate of food that happened to have blond hair was disingenuous to say the least. There. That’s out of the way. Putting aside all the bluster about blasphemy by secular observers whose relation to religion is probably a checkbox item, I believe there is a real story lurking in all the feigned outrage. a neon flash of double standards. It’s a media story, probably meaningless to those who aren’t ancient enough to have witnessed Obama’s first year in office. He was kind of everywhere, on every news interview program, every newspaper headline, and every magazine cover. (For the youngsters in the audience, there used to be things called magazines with words and pictures in them. It was a big deal to be featured on their covers.) If you weren’t a big Obama fan — and maybe even if you were — this got to be kind of sickening a...
Comments