Being the continuation of InstaPunk and InstaPunk Rules
Thoughts on Dershowitz
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Dancing with Mr. D.
Is it possible to be a Progressive Democrat and only half a dead man walking?
I think so. That’s the nature of my interest in Alan Dershowitz. He is simultaneously an example of what was worthwhile about the American liberal tradition and what is so tragically wrong with the contemporary Progressive UniParty that is speeding the United States to ruin at terrifying speed.
He is aware of this dichotomy in himself. Atypically for a man of his legal acumen, he flounders when he tries to provide advice and counsel during his many televised interviews on the legal tornado surrounding Trump. He knows the kangaroo courts are wrong, perhaps horribly wrong, but he repeatedly falls back on his lifelong status as a Democrat and insists not only that he voted for Biden but intends to do so again. Which in a man of his reputed intellectual stature would be self-evidently absurd; Biden has always been stupid and inept and is now declining into physical and mental incapacity. Dershowitz is tap-dancing between a rock and a hard place.
This is a schizoid phenomenon worth looking into. My intention here is not a biography of the “unique individual” that is Alan Dershowitz. My aim instead is to make useful inferences about an archetype of a fine mind being riven and slowly consumed by a soul-threatening disease.
Why an archetype? Not just because of the big-time lawyer thing. That’s a big part of it obviously, but he’s also representative of a public life lived so much in the mass media that the man of substance is also a celebrity and thus famous for being famous. Further, Dershowitz is important to examine because of his chronological age, which is far more significant than pundits ever seem to recognize.
The life in public is easily demonstrated. When I was writing Shuteye Nation (SN) a quarter century ago, he had already been a celebrity lawyer for decades. This was my entry for him in SN’s “Who’s Who” section (Note that the highlighted superscripts are working links to definitions in “The Glossary.)
WW.Y2000: <<Alan Dirtiwitz. The most brilliantly sanctimonious of all TV lawyers°, Dirtiwitz is capable of convincing even the most average Amerian (and you know how skeptical they are) that he’s the one who invented the concept of law° in the first place and is therefore the only one competent to explain it. Famous for his tirades about such topics as principle°, fairness°, and justice°, he has proved the immense scale of his own professional integrity° with the breathtaking fees he charged murderers like Ojay Simson and Klaus Von Bully for their acquittals. He has also written many books, including a novel about a brilliant TV lawyer who almost gets his own daughter murdered by one of his murderer clients and a nonfiction book about how it’s okay to lie about sex even if you didn’t go to Harvurd, provided you went to Yail instead. Most recently, Dirtiwitz got pretty effing steamed about the unprincipled° way the Republians° tried to convict Clitton for committing perjury° and obstructing justice°in a sex trial. In response to an extremely nasty and unprincipled spate of rumors following his defense of the Presdent, Dirtiwitz has sworn under oath that he’s had sex° himself on more than one occasion. He has since added to this testimony—informally—with the claim that his partner enjoyed herself too. Both times.>>
If you don’t trust my bias, here’s the current introduction to the Wikipedia entry on Mr. D.:
WIKI: <<Alan Morton Dershowitz (/ˈdɜːrʃəwɪts/ DURR-shə-wits; born September 1, 1938) is an American lawyer and former law professor known for his work in U.S. constitutional law and American criminal law. From 1964 to 2013, he taught at Harvard Law School, where he was appointed as the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law in 1993. Dershowitz is a regular media contributor, political commentator, and legal analyst.
Dershowitz has taken on high-profile and often unpopular causes and clients. As of 2009, he had won 13 of the 15 murder and attempted murder cases he handled as a criminal appellate lawyer. Dershowitz has represented such celebrity clients as Mike Tyson, Patty Hearst, Leona Helmsley, Julian Assange, and Jim Bakker. Major legal victories have included two successful appeals that overturned convictions, first for Harry Reems in 1976, then in 1984 for Claus von Bülow, who had been convicted of the attempted murder of his wife, Sunny. In 1995, Dershowitz served as the appellate adviser on the murder trial of O. J. Simpson, part of the legal "Dream Team", alongside Johnnie Cochran and F. Lee Bailey. He was a member of Harvey Weinstein's defense team in 2018 and of President Donald Trump's defense team in his first impeachment trial in 2020. He was a member of Jeffrey Epstein's defense team and helped to negotiate a 2006 non-prosecution agreement on Epstein's behalf.>>
Wiki also lists Dershowitz as the author of multiple books about law and politics, including a novel, The Advocate’s Devil, and a case history that got made into a movies starring Jeremy Irons as Claus von Bülow and Ron Silver as Dershowitz.
Click pic for trailer…
What Wiki does not mention is Dershowitz’s newest book, which is searingly critical of what the American legal profession has become. Thinking Wiki don’t like this one too much.
These days he is being interviewed everywhere about the parade of antiTrump cases trooping through the courts. As much as he knows that the entire legal campaign stinks, his tone is slightly different depending on which political mindset is sitting in the interviewer chair. So much time spent on cable news sets turns celebrities into performers seeking interviewer approval. Asked by a lefty he can find aspects of the classified document case that “don’t look good” for Trump. You mean, aside from the unconstitutional search on which the entire case is founded, followed by prosecutorial misconduct smashing the Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination and other requirements of due process, the banishing of the legally sacrosanct attorney-client privilege by an Obama appointed judge, and the repeated leaking of protected Grand Jury testimony to the press while the Biden and Pence cases proceed(ed) in legally required silence?
What is going on with Mr. D.? At a deep level, outside of the mass media merry-go-round? This is where chronological age comes into play. Dershowitz is 84 years old. Born in 1938. Here’s the first thing that’s important about that… how he was raised and educated:
WIKI: << Dershowitz was born in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on September 1, 1938, the son of Claire (née Ringel) and Harry Dershowitz, an Orthodox Jewish couple. He was raised in Borough Park. His father was a founder and president of the Young Israel of Boro Park Synagogue in the 1960s, served on the board of directors of the Etz Chaim School in Borough Park, and in retirement was co-owner of the Manhattan-based Merit Sales Company. Dershowitz's first job was at a deli factory on Manhattan's Lower East Side in 1952, at age 14.
Dershowitz attended Yeshiva University High School, an independent boys' prep school owned by Yeshiva University, in Manhattan, where he played on the basketball team. He was a rebellious student, often criticized by his teachers. He later said his teachers told him to do something that "requires a big mouth and no brain ... so I became a lawyer". After graduating from high school, he studied political science at Brooklyn College, graduating in 1959 with a Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude. He then attended Yale Law School, where he was editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He graduated in 1962 ranked first in his class with a Bachelor of Laws. He was a member of a Conservative minyan at Harvard Hillel but is a secular Jew.>>
People over the age of 78 are not Baby Boomers. Nowadays, they mostly belong to a rarely discussed demographic: War Babies (who in the context of WWII were born between Sep1938 and Aug1945.) The irony is that they did more to shape American Culture in the 50+ years before the 21st Century than the highly publicized Baby Boomers did. There have been three Baby Boomer Presidents and no War Baby Presidents at all. So what’s the big deal about a comparatively small population who spent their early childhoods in the years of uncertainty, rationing, deaths of family and friends, and early awareness of headlines than their far more pampered younger siblings?
Answer? Most of the biggest cultural impacts that made even today’s youngest Americans who and what they are today.
Who led the music revolution of the 1960s that made youth into a separate culture, secular, seduced by drugs and the temptations of “free love,” and the amorphous paranoia of any ignorant group that lives in a silo of equally myopic peers and feels entitled to have whatever they want? Who?
Bob Dylan, the Beatles, The Rolling Stones, the Who(?!), Pink Floyd, the Kinks, Jefferson Airplane, the Grateful Dead, Led Zeppelin, The Doors, Tina Turner, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Lou Reed, Ronny & the Ronettes, Steppenwolf, Judy Collins, Joni Mitchell, Credence Clearwater Revival, and the Animals were founded or headlined by War Babies, not Boomers. Amazingly, all popular music since their arrival at center stage has flowed from them, their music still fills the airwaves of American radio stations, and the ones who are still alive are still performing or thinking about their next comeback tour.
One can argue that the music led the politics or that the politics led the music, but the War Babies were also out front in the new left revolution of the 1960s, including Tom Hayden, Bernadine Dohrn, Bill Ayers, Jerry Rubin, Bobbie Seale, Huey Newton, H. Rap Brown, et al.
The same holds true for serious writing that reached and molded the minds of Baby Boomers was not written by Boomers but talented pre-Boomers named Kurt Vonnegut, J. D. Salinger, Philip Roth, Saul Donald Barthelme, John Barth, Saul Bellow, Susan Sontag, et al, plus nonfiction tracts by Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, Susan Brownmiller and other feminists born in the 1930s. The two key players in the Watergate reportage that set the stage for career-destroying mass media were the War Babies Robert Woodward and Carl Bernstein.
During the 50 years when War Babies were remaking America, Baby Boomers did a lot of not much. Not much memorable music, writing, or for that matter, politicking. All they learned how to do from their War Baby siblings was drugs and turning sociopathic at puberty. Boomer Bubba Clinton got himself elected President but his real legacy to the nation was the further erosion of the rule of law during the Lewinsky scandal and (far worse) the unleashing on the nation of his Medusa wife Hillary. Who paved the way for the disastrous Baby Boomer Obama reign and the subsequent seven-year coup attempt by Hillary to destroy Trump and the United States. (George W. was also a Baby Boomer. Not too good for the Boomer Brand, eh…?) Now, as the War Babies die off, taking their fire and creativity and rebellion with them, we have as a nation subsided into a herd of sheeple.
Back to Dershowitz. He’s a model War Baby, with personal circumstances amplified by his Orthodox Jewish elementary and middle school education, his assimilation into the FDR-acolyte universities (Yale and Harvard) of the immensely powerful CHYOS Old Boy networks in law and politics. These circumstances are responsible for the deep inner conflicts assailing him now.
He probably acquired respect, love, and passion for the law in his early immersion in the Talmud, That font of legal argumentation about theology which resides inside all morally based legal systems. This line from the Wiki text is provocative though: “He was a member of a Conservative minyan at Harvard Hillel but is a secular Jew.”
Why secular? That would be CHYOS and its absorbed from Oxford, long slow surrender to de facto if not de jure atheism. As he became a fierce Harvard advocate and professor at its law school, Dershowitz came to accept that whatever remained of his religious Jewish faith could be confined to his identification with the Jewish people, culture, and post-WWII nationality. He was an active, ardent Zionist with all the associated human emotions, be also had this to say about his philosophy as a defense attorney:
“At the time of the [Simpson] murders, Dershowitz was just finishing a book called The Abuse Excuse--and Other Cop-Outs, Sob Stories, and Evasion of Responsibility. Concerned that Dershowitz's thesis may negatively impact Simpson's case, Shapiro decided to hire Dershowitz, in part to "shut him up." Rarely present in court, Dershowitz spent most of his time handling motions and other support documents. His main assignment was to prepare for possible appellate review of an adverse trial outcome.
In his book, The Best Defense, Dershowitz gave a view of the approach he would later take in the Simpson case. "Once I decide to take a case," Dershowitz wrote, "I have only one agenda: I want to win. I will try, by every fair and legal means, to get my client off--without regard to the consequences." In his memoir The Best Defense, Dershowitz noted that "almost all of my clients have been guilty."
Dershowitz was not politically active, at least openly, during his tenure at Harvard. But he was unquestionably a witness to the overtly political organizing of Laurence Tribe, a fellow professor and SCOTUS wannabe, who identified and groomed promising candidates for national political careers in elected and high-level appointed offices. Since this days, Tribe has been discredited and disgraced as a conspiracy theorist and, well, deranged Trump hater. Why should we car about Laurence Tribe?
FTA: <<After graduating from law school, Tribe clerked for justice Mathew Tobriner of the Supreme Court of California from 1966 to 1967, then for justice Potter Stewart of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1967 to 1968. He then joined the Harvard Law School faculty as an assistant professor, receiving tenure in 1972. Among his law students and research assistants while on the faculty at Harvard have been President Barack Obama (a research assistant for over two years), Chief Justice John Roberts, US Senator Ted Cruz, Former D.C. Circuit Chief Judge and Attorney General Merrick Garland, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Other notable students of Tribe were U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, Chair of the House Intelligence Committee and lead manager for the first Impeachment of Donald Trump, and Jamie Raskin, lead manager for the second Donald Trump impeachment.
Tribe was part of Al Gore's legal team regarding the results of the 2000 United States presidential election. Due to the close nature of the vote count, recounts had been initiated in Florida, and the recounts had been challenged in court. Tribe argued the initial case in Federal Court in Miami in which they successfully argued that the court should not stop the recount of the votes which was taking place and scheduled to take place in certain counties. David Boies argued for the Gore team in a related matter in the Florida State Courts regarding the dates that Secretary of State of FloridaKatherine Harris would accept recounts. When the original Federal case, Bush v. Gore, was appealed, Gore and his advisers decided at the last minute to have Boies instead of Tribe argue the case at the Supreme Court. The court determined that recounts of votes should cease and that accordingly George W. Bush had been elected president….>>
(What happened after that you can read about here at Instapunk Returns.)
Where does all this put us? And where has it put Dershowitz? His new book constitutes a deep admission that the Harvard Law School to which he gave his professional life is now the Point of the Spear In creating a new, incredibly powerful elite ruling class that is — and behaves — contemptuously above the law, without principle or morality. So we know he’s feeling the pain of betrayal and loss. But at some point in the past, at some level, he was at least passively complicit in the unfolding destruction of his beloved Constitution. He might feel a need to make amends.
But he has also a record and a reputation. He defends his clients with every tool available or imaginable, and his ‘clients’ in national matters have always been Democrats. You can almost see the hammer fight going on his brain. And it’s doing damage. He’s no longer the 160-ish IQ he started with. And the difference isn’t athero-sclerosis. It’s mind disease. Imagine it as feeling often and unexpectedly dizzy, unable to determine precise orientations in mental space between impulse and judgment. The result? Even his legal arguments on teevee sound partial, tentative, and defensive rather than wise. After framing some weird ambiguous legalism regarding a Trump case, he still feels comfortable enough with Bannon to complain about the hurt of being shunned by lifelong friends and even members of his own family. And he simply cannot, like many of my erstwhile FB friends, make a clean break with those whose minds are wholly gone, no matter how close they once were.
In terms of cerebration he’s dancing on a tilting, turning floor in what amounts to a battle between the dismembered pieces of his soul. Is it just possible that there’s a seed of the old War Baby in there somewhere, fighting for life? I don’t know.
I can’t stand to watch him much anymore, but I feel sorry for him. I admire his accomplishments and the caliber of mind he once posessed. Still, I was pushed to go to law school when it seemed every smart guy had to, and I turned it down. As an attorney, I’d inevitably be a courtroom warrior. But as I contemplated becoming a defense attorney for an endless stream of the guilty, or a prosecutor whose performance is measured in conviction statistics (and a system rigged in their favor by incompetent appeals courts), I realized I could not tolerate a career on either side of the divide. Because if you’re not careful it can lead to the place this sad 84 year old man is flailing through a duet with himself…
RAV’s Frank Gaffney discussing existential crisis of AI with statecraft guru Sam Faddish. What could go wrong? This, for one thing: He has his own gaggle of Chicken Little AI experts. And, inevitably, this: Me, when I’m not hiding my true self behind a photograph They’re all worried about AI. Terrified in fact. For different reasons. Bannon has some apocalyptic seer who’s worried about meta-humans replacing Homo sapiens. Gaffney and Faddis are fixated on the latest AI hot topic, “The Singularity,” that magic moment when a supercomputer becomes self aware and decides to exterminate mankind. How did we get here? The usual way. The movies. First, there was HAL: Then, just a quarter century later, after a decades-long detour through a dead-end time paradox called The Terminator , there came the monstrous harpy HAL, a transgendered terminator in a box, like we’d been brought up to believe in, including Gaffney and Faddis: Worried yet? Here’s her resumé and mission statement. C...
Are we being distracted from the real problem? This is a fairly typical posting from the right-leaning media… FTA: <<Liberal celebrities and entertainers love to get preachy with the public. It’s almost like it’s coded in their DNA. They just can’t resist it. One public relations expert recently said that the public is sick and tired of it. People want to be entertained, not lectured to. He used two specific examples. Bruce Springsteen and the Black Crowes. Springsteen’s concerts have become more like liberal talk radio and the Black Crowes actually had audience members walk out on them for trashing the USA. Doug Eldridge, the founder of Achilles PR, says people have had it with this. “At this point, it’s fatigue,” Eldridge said. “Much like compounding interest, it’s not a linear calculation; it’s accumulation,” he continued. “For the last decade, fans (read: average Americans) have been lectured, lied to, gaslit, and shamed, if they didn’t confo...
How did we get here from here ? Don’t forget the question. We’ll be answering it by the end of the post, in our usual roundabout way. Today is the last day of May, finally, and therefore the Last Day of May Madness. I don’t pretend to know what June will bring and what epithet it will earn, but this second part of yesterday’s ramble is about showing you that madness takes different people differently, and mine is not so much random infantilism as obsessive curiosity derived from my relationship with the universe. The universe speaks to me in ways both overt and intimational, which is my own word and also the tacit permission I give you to interpret my references to the universe as free-association play with my particular universe, of which I have documented abundant bits and pieces and bigger parts too. I wouldn’t do that if I didn’t think there was some value to it. Yesterday we started with RINOs in the news and the funny curse they seem to have brought upon themselves, and we ended...
They don’t let me out much anymore. I feel like Uncle Fred . Back on the first of April I rechristened the next 30 days April Fools Month. Turns out I was right to do that, as the Democrat downward spiral into an unhinged opposite of what it once prided itself for became more laughable by the day. Now we are on the 30th day of what I am hopefully about to bury as “May Madness,” a cringe-inducing period of violent Dem fantasies and true-life violence they deplore without seeming able to connect their own rhetoric with mass shootings and assassination attempts. They’re actually proud of themselves. A lot like their Republican counterpart, the RINOs, whose only sign of backbone in many years has been their willingness to defy Trump and conspire openly against the legislative priorities he was elected to implement. And, like the Dems, they're proud of themselves. It’s not a small group. Let me count the stiff-necked feeders at the Wall St/Pharma/Amnesty/Pork/Antisemite trough who have ...
How this post got started… No secret that my sleep habits are a lot like That Man’s, the one so many Americans love to hate. I’ve been losing my optimism about 2.0 for a long time now, not because I don’t trust his resolve or motives but because the pessimism is a powerful force I’ve struggled against all my adult life. Which began too soon, as I’ve described elsewhere. Like him, I’m running out of time in the natural human sense of it. More still to do than likely years to do it in. My sleep comes only in chunks, punctuated by dream-induced wake-up calls that send me to the keyboard and the net and the pile of work sitting there in the in-basket. I sympathize with the champions of MAGA who are sounding so tetchy and miserable at the moment. They’re convinced they must keep trying to impress on the low-attention-span voters in their audience just how important it is to understand the depth and depravity and dastardly deeds of the Deep State. But I don’t need to be reminded. What I...
Lewis Hamilton wins Seventh World Championship at Formula 1 Grand Prix in Turkey: A stunning drive from Mercedes’ Lewis Hamilton in the Turkish Grand Prix gave him his 10th victory of the season – and, more crucially, saw him claim the seventh drivers’ title of his career, to equal the record of Michael Schumacher, as Racing Point’s Sergio Perez and Ferrari’s Sebastian Vettel completed the podium after a thrilling race in Istanbul. Hamilton had started the race in sixth, risen to third midway through the first lap and then dropped back to sixth by the end of Lap 1 after an error at Turn 9. But a decision to change his intermediate tyres just once saw Hamilton drive a masterful race to claim victory by over 25 seconds from Perez. The win alone was enough to claim championship #7, but it was even more assured after a disastrous race for Valtteri Bottas - the only man who could have stopped Hamilton winning the title today - who spun six times en route to a P14 finish.
One of these installed in at least five different cities You probably think this is going to be a screed or a lecture. It isn’t. It’s an honest question, asked out of curiosity: WHAT ARE YOU GETTING OUT OF ALL THIS? Almost no one comments here, so I’m not expecting answers. I’m asking you to think about the question for yourselves, with some specificity. To wit: Has the amount of emotion you’ve invested in hating Trump for 10 years made you happier? Is your marriage better, your sex life more satisfying, your circle of friends wider, your career more prosperous, your state of mind more equable and fulfilling? How has your perspective on life changed during the last 10 years? Are you more or less optimistic, diversified in your leisure-time pursuits, content with the personal choices you’ve been making on a day-to-day basis, balanced between the frequently opposing pulls of intellect and emotion? How has your self image (your amour-propre, as the French would say) evolved dur...
…and a weird dose of nostalgia, as for something half remembered. What did you do for your Memorial Day remembrances? We watched the laying off the wreath at the Tomb of the Unknowns and the President’s speech. The audience was large, and the people there looked amazingly normal. Attentive and respectful. The way our parents taught us to be at solemn events. We heard the fireworks begin after dark and out the Thundershirt on our terrier Tommy, who isn’t entirely sure that fireworks aren’t an approaching thunderstorm. All we needed of that timeless ritual, since we’ve both been to May such occasions, including the field a mile away where the Salem even is always held. It was only at bedtime that I tried something new. In my constant search for background sounds that facilitate the hours of sleep I get before the inevitable wee hours summons to the keyboard, I try different things, usually intended to be monotonous and therefore soporific. British crime documentary series are ...
A snip of what’s up at Reels. I wouldn’t normally use this site to promote a single joke at Facebook’s Reels investment in ACHD social network communications. This is a special case in a couple ways. The graphic basis comes from a post at Breitbart by John Nolte, whom we admire for his courage and his encyclopedic knowledge of (yeah, I’ll use the highfalutin’ word…) Cinema . It’s long been a conviction of mine that the most indispensable credential for opinionating is knowing at least one subject extremely well. Nolte’s love and expertise about all things connected to Hollywood and its extraordinary cultural contribution for over a hundred and fifty years now qualifies as just such a credential. He was with Breitbart from the beginning and has survived all the ups and downs there because he never stops doing what he does best, which is write about all the phenomena that have affected and changed the world since this breakthrough project was produced in 1872: Edward Muybridge. Ever hear...
The post referenced in the title is about an IPR National Insurrection analysis that is presently underway. Putting it together is a real slog, and I don’t like slogs, which is why I’m putting pressure on myself by publishing this in advance. It’s really just data, but it’s data that show you just how deceptive the presentation and supposed analysis of data can be. Part of the Insurrection post is examining differentials between various troubled regions of the United States. For many kinds of behavioral variables, there are nicely produced maps compiled by this and that federal or public interest organization. Examples I’ve collected so far in researching my post. [Note: Per 100,000 numbers are less messy for the social scientists to soil their hands with than collectively shocking totals.] Of course, it’s very difficult to amass data that won’t be disputed about deaths per 100,000 sexually active females of fertile age. None of the data collectors really like using total deaths as a s...
Comments