Comment to FB Doyenne Debra J. Saunders


She posted a link to her own column at the Las Vegas Review-Journal with the teaser subhead “Saving Trump from himself.” I was the first to comment:

“Saving Trump from himself.” Nonsense. Trump haters are the masters of having their cake and eating it too. Trump is authoritarian — he surrounds himself with toadies who agree with everything he says or follow him blindly. Trump is incompetent at picking staff — he keeps firing so many the WH looks like a revolving door. Trump is so volatile and unstable that it takes his staff to save him from catastrophic errors, which enables us to see how truly weak and in over his head he is.

 Which is it? You can’t have it all. Most likely, Trump is a tough boss, a hard taskmaster with little patience for screwups. His White House must be a contentious place, maybe with lots of yelling. (Of what President has it NOT been said that he had a temper and blew his stack at times? GWB maybe, and possibly some others who came to be criticized for being creatures of their staffs...)

Of course, none of you political experts has ever lost his temper and vowed to do this, that, or the other thing in anger that you ultimately did not do — because you got it off your chest with the big yell or wound up listening to counselors you rely on because you can trust their judgment in emotional tight spots.

 All of your analysis of Trump — Who he is and Who he isn’t — is the purest crap. You’ve been myopic eyewitnesses of one of the most searing and threatening ordeals any president has ever had to face, let alone a newly elected president. You were always johnny-on-the-spot with your junk analyses that were usually proven wrong within days of your having written them. But your idiot fascination with your own egos prevented you from seeing what is blindingly obvious to any acute observer. Written weeks ago here:

Saying What No One Else Wants to Say About Trump (Reposted at IPR yesterday)

I must tell you, lots and lots of people out here are fed to the teeth with your tired dumb-smart schtick. And I’m sure they will slowly but surely start confronting you for your arrogant buffoonery, past AND present. Get used to it.

This is an exhortation to all of you. Don’t just ignore the haters. Confront them. Not with expletives but with evidence. Make them uncomfortable. Make them defend the outrageous nonsense they’ve offered to the public debate in the past as well as what they’re pontificating about today. What the Internet is best at: Preserving a Record of the Past. Use it.



Comments

Post a Comment

Readers also liked…

A Near-Perfect Microcosm of “The Swamp”

Image
Ontogeny recapitulates philogeny. There’s an intensely contemporary reason for taking a close look at Scientology. The Swamp is so huge it seems like the Borg. But what are the stripped down essentials of the Borg? Here’s a look at a laboratory example, a microcosm if you will. In the interests of full disclosure, I did encounter Scientology back in the weird year of 1968. I was in Boston, got scooped in to a “Dianetics” exercise, and got speedily thrown out for having too much “charge” to participate. The one in charge was blond, bland to the point of creepy, and I almost (but not quite) succeeded in making him lose his temper. In further interests of disclosure, I spent years on Facebook, debating Trump-haters. They did lose their tempers. But they also exhibited the exact same repetition of Talking Points the lefties (and Scientologists) employ. Exact. Same. Words. How I made the cult connection. Overview Like it says. Troublemaker. Destroy Utterly  Horror Show Squared More ... More
Read more

A Reclamation Project Begun

Image
As you work your way through the links here, don’t be shy. Get ‘Click Happy.’ Even on pics. FIGHTING BACK ONE FILE AT A TIME … How bad has it gotten? I uploaded this video from the old Instapunk at YouTube an hour ago. It has already been removed for violating YT Community Standards.  There’s a pdf version, just published, of the post from Instapunk.com the video above was created for. Nobody censored it 15 years ago. Back then, it was unquestioningly covered as freedom of expression. Here’s my pdf file of ‘ The Goosestep Enigma ’.  This was by no means the most controversial post or graphic included in Instapunk’s 2,000+++ posts over the years. Now I’m going back in time to make pdf versions of the key parts of that website, meaning the most comical, controversial, reflective, insightful, and graphically provocative. But why reinvent the wheel. It’s all still there, isn’t it? The sad fact is that the truly huge resource called Instapunk.com is facing a ticking clock. The original site
Read more

The Best Book on the Trump Phenomenon

Image
Everybody rushed in after the fact to be first with the goods on how Trump pulled off the biggest electoral upset in modern presidential history. I was already ahead of them though. I had been covering the political briar patch with a steady diary approach for four presidential election cycles, both terms of W, the meteoric rise and weird re-election of Barack Obama, and of course the first flutterings of the Republican country club riot over replacing him. I had three blogs to draw from over that time, and a couple+ books out of it, including one demonstrating that I had Obama  figured out long before even his fiercest beltway critics caught on. Here’s another relevant book . I recognized the unique potential of Trump to win the whole thing early, in June of 2014. I could prove it. Why has it taken me this long to do my own book about the most spectacular politician of all our lifetimes? Two reasons. I didn’t realize I had produced so much material about Trump, the blog in whic
Read more

Guess I’m the last one who’s fighting back with nunchucks…

Image
YEAH. THE VP DEBATE You have no idea. This is all an apotheosis for me. The Joke meme has captured me. Like, you know, I know there will be Democrats out there and vociferating about how good Walz did in appropriate ethnic accents. Defending Kamala was always a loser. Bathos is hell.  And they think this POS is on their side. They do. Actually this is called projection. Here’s the real basis of Tim Walz. A banjo-banging would-be wise man who claimed Minnesota children were “above average.” Keep watching, rolling over to the next vid too. Keillor is a Walz… uh huh. Older, fatter, meltier… 2028 My very first blog, Gloves Off, contained a spirited defense of the ones we used to call Ladies. All gone now except for the ones still motoring onward with walkers and cute hair with no cosmetic surgery. They were mostly mothers. Not all. I have memories none of you can match — my own mother, Addie and Adelaide, Mildred Conklin, Gwendolyn Fennessy, Emma Jones, Rosa Riggs, Joy Coleman, Sis Hine, I
Read more

About those White Dudes for Harris

Image
The Boss White Dude Bradley Whitford When I first heard the name “White Dudes for Harris” I thought immediately of Bradley Whitford. It was the role of his lifetime. Playing White House power behind the scenes Josh Lyman, who bullied his secretary to make things happen for the righteous presidency of Jeb “Martin Sheen” Josiah Bartlet, a little guy with MS who was in every way a precursor of Obama but for being physically small and weak and gloriously intelligent like no one else who could talk Christian while being the smartest meanest man in the room.  Bradley Whitford himself went to Wesleyan University, one of the ‘Little Three,’ who always knew they were smarter than Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Are we cool enough yet or what? I always despised the smug self-hagiography of the West Wing. The longest running political propaganda as soap opera entertainment in the history of American television. Bradley got himself Emmies and Golden Globes pushing his own inane political agendas.  T
Read more

Don’t like Trump? Get over it.

Image
Another has-been life ruined beyond repair. Trump Curse writ large. Rosie O’Donnell still can’t get over the fact that Trump won the Republican nomination in 2016 by blowing off Megyn Kelly’s gotcha question about his mean tweets to women, using her as the completely understandable punchline.   Millions of men, and even some women, said to themselves, “I would do that too.” She’s a sad case. But this latest outburst got me to thinking. Maybe I’ve been unfair to The Donald myself over the years. With my wife and others, I’ve taken the position that I admire Trump as a President and would-be savior of the Republic. I’ve also said I wouldn’t have him in my house for dinner. Or, less pompously, that I have never had any desire to meet him in person. I have fought strenuously for his political life and fortunes. No one can deny that. But I also fought for George W and Mitt Romney (as I had done for McCain, whom I genuinely despised) when they were running. Didn’t want to meet them eit
Read more